[eternaldag]

so our realms will be destroyed?

[dragoncrystal24]

so our realms will be destroyed?

Obviously. We're getting a map wipe. Clean map, nothing on it.


But yeah I think parties should be able to be big, like if someone wanted to go on a huge pvp expedition and they needed to communicate with people not in their realm.

[Ligtbulbs]

I look forward conquering other nation chest rooms, and covering chests with obsidian.
I will give half items in chests in return for ability to open them.

And I would like setting that allows PvP in my nation to everybody in there. I should be able to stab trespassers whether they like or not.

[dragoncrystal24]

I look forward conquering other nation chest rooms, and covering chests with obsidian.
I will give half items in chests in return for ability to open them.

And I would like setting that allows PvP in my nation to everybody in there. I should be able to stab trespassers whether they like or not.

Lightbulbs, you've been banned! you won't be allowed back on! Seriously, you need to accept that fact. You won't be able to go conquering chest rooms, at least not on this server.

[Ligtbulbs]

Lightbulbs, you've been banned! you won't be allowed back on! Seriously, you need to accept that fact. You won't be able to go conquering chest rooms, at least not on this server.

I am not Lightbulbs, but Soviet Comrade Cousin Ligtbulbs. I shocked at how Americans are so bad at English.

[Th3Guy]

View #1:
So new players are assigned to a random country so they can get used to how the server works?

My view:
So new untrusted players are assigned to a random country that most likely has /chest realm?...


Hello kick from realm command. :?

[dragoncrystal24]

View #1:
So new players are assigned to a random country so they can get used to how the server works?

My view:
So new untrusted players are assigned to a random country that most likely has /chest realm?...


Hello kick from realm command. :?

Remember, only the one who places a chest can access that chest.



And Lightbulbs, Ligtbulbs, whatever, we all know you are the same person. You're not convincing anybody.

[Ligtbulbs]

And Lightbulbs, Ligtbulbs, whatever, we all know you are the same person. You're not convincing anybody.

I am saddened that illiterate capitalist baby doesn't believe me.
Actually, I am not. That was American Sarcasm that Lightbulbs taught me. Ha ha.

[cerevox]

Between the random assignment of new players and assimilation of the defeated, each country is going to need more or less constant purging if it wants to keep only trusted members which will suck to keep doing.

[eagleclaw6]

I have some questions/comments/suggestions after reading the OP and the thread:

• As usual, I support full creeper effects, but w/e
• Chests:
  • For /chests, what happens if a player named party, or friends, or realm joins the server? I don't actually think that this will be a problem , but I still I suggest making it something like /chest toggle <user> or using add/remove.
  • Also for /chest I would like a /chest list to see who has access.
• I'm just checking: are we actually going to have /sign for everyone?
• The election/leader system needs some work:
  • What if a country doesn't want 3 leaders? In a 6 person country this would be half the population
  • Even in a 15 person country, a coup could easily be staged with 3 people online
  • Who does the election elect; does it elect one person to replace the oldest leader or replace all three?
  • I propose a new leader/election system:
    • First off, I think it should be called /leader, since the point is to adjust the leaders
    • When a country is created, the leader of the party is automatically made the leader of the country
    • If they want to add another leader, someone can use /leader add <user> (This will start the voting process, but not actually call for a vote yet; see 2 bullets down)
    • To remove a leader the leader can either /leader abdicate or /leader leave, or someone can use /leader remove <user>
    • To start an actual vote three online players need to call for a vote within 5 minutes of each other
    • The vote lasts 48 hours
    • To make elections feasible only the people who log on during the vote are counted in the total number of people
    • If a certain number of the people who log on vote yes the action is taken. For adding a leader: 50%. For removing a leader: 75% (These numbers can change, I'm just throwing something out there).
    • idk if this is possible but it would be really cool if you got a pm on the forums if your country was having an election
    • When anyone in the country logs on they get a message if there is an election happening
• So there will be no way to get back to the main spawn? That would make trading difficult
• I think that after the first week new people should be automatically assigned to a set of 9 or so plots near (3x3) spawn in a special country called something like "new people" that would have signs explaining the rules and how to join countries.
• We will only be able to be part of one country? Aww.
• We should be able to leave our country without joining a new one with /country leave
• 1 minute for most of the time limits seems too small, maybe 10 minutes?
• Will breaking a block remove a credit?
• If not, a country could have one plot that they break down to the bedrock and then fill it up to the sky with cobble or something, giving them a ton of points. They could then use those points to buy other land, giving them room to build actual structures
• I know I'm repeating someone, but why can parties only have 6 people?

If I didn't mention it, that means that I probably really like the idea.
Overall, I think 3.0 sounds great!
----------------

2: if everyone in a realm immigrates, what happens to that realm?

Do you mean emigrates?

3: I think we should be able to give other realms credits. They could use that to create some economy thing. One realm will give the other credits in exchange for diamonds, etc

That would be great!
----------------
What is happening to creative? Is it just going away?