[Pyzon]

No they don't.

He asked why not.

Because once your realm expands you can remove the old blocks and your block count wont go down.

Now you can't place the blocks in the same spot.... cus that doesn't add any points...

but you can move the blocks to a NEW spot.

And now we have a endless cycle because realms expand and there are always new spots.

People can do this now, I do not see how being able to do it with, a "3" diamond block vs a "1" diamond block is a real problem.

[Lightbulbs]

People can do this now, I do not see how being able to do it with, a "3" diamond block vs a "1" diamond block is a real problem.

"People are already exploiting a bug, so I don't see the issue with making it 3 times more exploitable"
Are you daft, stupid, or trolling?

[Pyzon]

Who said its a bug, it looks like it works as intended to me, and if it is a bug why not fix it? Does nobody fix bugs anymore? Eitherway ppl with thier cobble monoliths are going to have all kinds of reasons this should never happen, and thats ok. I just think having diamonds/gold maybe even lapis/obsidian count for a little more would be great, if it is doable.

[Lightbulbs]

Who said its a bug, it looks like it works as intended to me, and if it is a bug why not fix it? Does nobody fix bugs anymore? Eitherway ppl with thier cobble monoliths are going to have all kinds of reasons this should never happen, and thats ok. I just think having diamonds/gold maybe even lapis/obsidian count for a little more would be great, if techniqly fesible.

So basically what you are saying is "I can't build a good project, so make it so if I place diamond blocks and destroy them it gives me more points to make my ugly realm even larger. If you don't want me to do this you should fix it, and since it's not fixed I'm allowed to do this"
Let me guess, your realm also has 3 members, is made of 98% cobble, and is set to private + no visitors.

[dragoncrystal24]

People can do this now, I do not see how being able to do it with, a "3" diamond block vs a "1" diamond block is a real problem.

"People are already exploiting a bug, so I don't see the issue with making it 3 times more exploitable"
Are you daft, stupid, or trolling?

srry to burst your bubble there, but calling someone daft or stupid is trolling.

[Lightbulbs]

People can do this now, I do not see how being able to do it with, a "3" diamond block vs a "1" diamond block is a real problem.

"People are already exploiting a bug, so I don't see the issue with making it 3 times more exploitable"
Are you daft, stupid, or trolling?

srry to burst your bubble there, but calling someone daft or stupid is trolling.

Sorry to burst your ego, but you don't know what daft means.

[dragoncrystal24]

Sorry to burst your ego, but you don't know what daft means.

quote from dictionary.com:

daft   
[daft, dahft] Show IPA
–adjective, -er, -est.
1.
senseless, stupid, or foolish.
2.
insane; crazy.
3.
Scot. merry; playful; frolicsome.

my guess is that you meant 1 or 2. correct me if I am wrong.

[Pyzon]

[/quote]So basically what you are saying is "I can't build a good project, so make it so if I place diamond blocks and destroy them it gives me more points to make my ugly realm even larger. If you don't want me to do this you should fix it, and since it's not fixed I'm allowed to do this"
Let me guess, your realm also has 3 members, is made of 98% cobble, and is set to private + no visitors.[/quote]

I dig and trap, Icarus does most the building, and I think he does an awesome job. I do not exploit bugs and did not even know you could take old blocks off and re-add them somewhere else, until I read it here. Bug or not I will not be doing that because it is counter productive, and at the same time if someone else wants to, I could care less, but if someone in power cares more, then they should fix it so it cannot be done, yes. That way it is not an issue and diamond can count for more, well until we hear the next sideways argument anyway.

[Cogohst]

He meant 1 dragon, but it doesn't help you much that you had to directly quote a dictionary.

[dragoncrystal24]

He meant 1 dragon, but it doesn't help you much that you had to directly quote a dictionary.

i just like proving people wrong by using direct evidence. i actually did know before that it was a synonym for stupid, i just checked the dictionary to see if there was some hidden meaning for the word.