- Sun Dec 08, 2013 10:50 pm
#179954
Since you have "ruined it for [your]self" and are "pretty sure we all know this appeal will get rejected", it won't make any difference if I post here, so I will post anyway.
Firstly, if you were going on like me, as you say, you would actually be in a much better position than you are now. I have been forum banned once, for 24 hours; the result of a trivial mistake which I will not make again. Otherwise, I have been quite clean on this forum.
Once more I must come back to the Unbound/Sneaker incident and your demonstrably malformed argument. I am talking exclusively about this single event, on which one solitary individual has a mild quarrel with another. It is not thousands upon thousands of people insulting Sneaker, creating a non-stop onslaught that can be psychologically damaging. As you said this is a very different situation, and as I said, if Sneaker cannot stand up to one single individual online, he has no place on the internet as it will only lead to negative consequences. So in this case, there is no need to stand up for him. It might actually do more harm than good.
Perhaps this situation is salvageable. If you wish to continue this discussion, I am willing to participate. Perhaps it will show staff that you have changed, that you are capable of keeping your cool and not flaming the instant you see an opinion that differs from your own. If not, I wish you luck in your life, and I really do mean it, as you probably won't be spending it here.
Firstly, if you were going on like me, as you say, you would actually be in a much better position than you are now. I have been forum banned once, for 24 hours; the result of a trivial mistake which I will not make again. Otherwise, I have been quite clean on this forum.
Once more I must come back to the Unbound/Sneaker incident and your demonstrably malformed argument. I am talking exclusively about this single event, on which one solitary individual has a mild quarrel with another. It is not thousands upon thousands of people insulting Sneaker, creating a non-stop onslaught that can be psychologically damaging. As you said this is a very different situation, and as I said, if Sneaker cannot stand up to one single individual online, he has no place on the internet as it will only lead to negative consequences. So in this case, there is no need to stand up for him. It might actually do more harm than good.
Perhaps this situation is salvageable. If you wish to continue this discussion, I am willing to participate. Perhaps it will show staff that you have changed, that you are capable of keeping your cool and not flaming the instant you see an opinion that differs from your own. If not, I wish you luck in your life, and I really do mean it, as you probably won't be spending it here.
Always right.
Rokkrwolf312 wrote:You people can't seem to grasp the fact griefing is griefing. There's no "Oh well it was only a few blocks," you break the rules you get banned plain and simple.
