[MEMYYSELFANDME!!]

Fine so there is a limit. However you do know that your suggestion is invalid because to get out you need to do one of the three commands. Since there was no portal to even begin with, you would be asking for Intelli to spawn in a portal, which is not allowed. If you want a command, it would completely destroy the whole "you're in wild commands to warp are disabled" thing.

[monkeychunks]

Respawn the dragon and kill it, or give the player /spawn. The only downside to that is that the player can /spawn to get away from another player, which if the end doesn't have an exit in the first place then there will be no pvp anyways. I would suggest allowing /spawn in the end until there is a better proposed way out. However the suggestion is to make a exit out of the end, so I really don't what kind of exit there is as long as there is a exit.

[dlgn]

I find this suggestion to be another way to crash our market even more.

Look at it this way, Kevin. What if Intelli had, after people had gotten out a few stacks of jungle wood (but no saplings), decided to make it impossible to leave the Wilderness without dying? All that clean land would become completely useless, although the market value for jungle wood would skyrocket.

You mainly want the end be able to leave and enter as please. The reason is because you just want to get end stone and an enderfarm to gain enderpearls. These two are valuable items that people sell. If you can just get it whenever you want, you will make it worth as little as nothing. The other suggestion already got rejected and I think yours is to because it. Is related to that one.

That's not why we want it. We want it because it would provide access to another 10,000x10,000 blocks of clean, unique land. And we want it because it's vanilla. If there were a way to efficiently grind Endermen in the Overworld, would you want Intelli to remove that as well? Or perhaps do you want him to disable the crafting of nether brick to protect that market? Market-crashing or not, it is vanilla, and preventing its use differs from MineRealm's core principles so much I'm surprised Intelli did it in the first place.

Fine so there is a limit. However you do know that your suggestion is invalid because to get out you need to do one of the three commands. Since there was no portal to even begin with, you would be asking for Intelli to spawn in a portal, which is not allowed. If you want a command, it would completely destroy the whole "you're in wild commands to warp are disabled" thing.

Either Intelli despawned the dragon (meaning respawning it would be legit) or he killed it, then destroyed the normally unbreakable portal with admin powers (meaning that recreating it would be legit). There isn't any other way for him to have prevented its existence.

~dlgn

[MEMYYSELFANDME!!]

The fact that you want more land means to me that we would have to see it gone in a matter of days for end stone. I also would predict that this "unique" land will just be griefed massively for its endstone
Edit: there was no time limit on that other suggestion. I can still choose what vote I want, which means it was rejected for a different reason...

[dlgn]

The fact that you want more land means to me that we would have to see it gone in a matter of days for end stone. I also would predict that this "unique" land will just be griefed massively for its endstone

There's always the possibility of some sort of protection, but all the potential griefing in the world won't change the fact that it is vanilla.

Besides, as I've said before, would you rather have a semi-griefed End, or a completely useless one? Not to mention that the End is so full of End Stone, even the most avid builder would eventually be satisfied within a short period of time, leaving plenty of building fodder and eerie, unique land for the rest of us to admire.

Speaking of which, this would also allow some fascinating new building styles, one of the things that drives MineRealm most.

[monkeychunks]

The fact that you want more land means to me that we would have to see it gone in a matter of days for end stone. I also would predict that this "unique" land will just be griefed massively for its endstone
Edit: there was no time limit on that other suggestion. I can still choose what vote I want, which means it was rejected for a different reason...

I doubt it will be gone very quickly. First the portals are hard to get to, and secondly once people realize how easy endstone is to get, and how much there is they will stop mining it.

[MEMYYSELFANDME!!]

The fact that you want more land means to me that we would have to see it gone in a matter of days for end stone. I also would predict that this "unique" land will just be griefed massively for its endstone

There's always the possibility of some sort of protection, but all the potential griefing in the world won't change the fact that it is vanilla.

Well even if it is vanilla, I am sure Intelli would have a strong reason to keep it one way in no way out. I highly doubt it will be protected at all. If nether isn't protected, then neither is the wilderness or end. Also note, since the other suggestion to make end habitable was rejected for a different reason, then what is the point in having a way back. You said you wanted it protected, but it cant be habitable. (Which means being able to go there and live there in this case) the only other reason would be to get blocks, but you would want protection meaning we can't destroy those blocks.

[dlgn]

The fact that you want more land means to me that we would have to see it gone in a matter of days for end stone. I also would predict that this "unique" land will just be griefed massively for its endstone

There's always the possibility of some sort of protection, but all the potential griefing in the world won't change the fact that it is vanilla.

Well even if it is vanilla, I am sure Intelli would have a strong reason to keep it one way in no way out. I highly doubt it will be protected at all. If nether isn't protected, then neither is the wilderness or end. Also note, since the other suggestion to make end habitable was rejected for a different reason, then what is the point in having a way back. You said you wanted it protected, but it cant be habitable. (Which means being able to go there and live there in this case) the only other reason would be to get blocks, but you would want protection meaning we can't destroy those blocks.

So far, Intelli has given no reason. And builds can still be made there without protection, per the no griefing rule, not to mention that most griefers wouldn't make the effort of going to the End. The protection would only be for certain parts (the spawn area, or private realms, perhaps), and whether Intelli decided to add protection to the End has nothing to do with the Nether or the Wilderness.

~dlgn

[monkeychunks]

If there was a problem with mining out to much end stone Intelli code just protect end stone and obsidian leaving the ability to build.... Now that I think about it if he allows /spawn or /home in the end but protects end stone and obsidian that would work out pretty well. He would have to also protect the placing of endstone though to prevent people from abusing it as a griefing tool. Im just throwing this out there. The suggestion still stands how it is though to make a way out of the end.

[Intelli]

How is this suggestion at 63% no, and the other suggestion only at 45% no, when the other suggestion included this identical suggestion? Do people even read the topics anymore?