[hippoface]

How about we stop attacking each other now.
It was a stupid suggestions, yes. It'll most likely never happen. Done.
Dlgn, everyone else on the forums besides us who said "no" seem to find your posts annoying, or more like your excessive posts, I guess. Tone it down a bit for them so this doesn't happen again.
Okay?
Okay.
Done. Nu moar problum.

[Aelcalan]

It's not in chat, therefore their votes will be TAKEN seriously, regardless of intent.

Additionally, I am exceptionally weary of hearing people complain about "free speech". Firstly, the owner's Canadian, so American rights do not necessarily apply. Second, free speech doesn't apply on private property, which in this case would be the server that someone else is paying for so that you can use.

Also, this wouldn't take away dlgn's ability to say what he likes, it would limit how MUCH he can say.

Now, have a civil discussion about talking too much.

[dlgn]

How about this: I'll limit my silliness more. Problem solved, no need for drama.

[SuperCreeper007]

I thought this hasn't been marked invalid because staff didn't have time to do so yet...

Are you (aimed at staff in general) saying that this kind of suggestion would be accepted with enough yes votes?

I know that Intelli has the power to, I'm just wondering if he would actually do this with a 75% vote.

[bloodthirsty958]

lol what? xD Here's an idea: instead of limiting dlgn's privileges on the forum, why don't you just ignore it? 28 people are that bothered by some text on a screen they can easily scroll away from. If this was for offensive or abusive behavior on the forum, that is one thing, and would be a ban request I assume. But voting on how much someone says because it ANNOYS you? Give me a break. What you need is more tolerance, you shouldn't be able to vote on these things anyway. What's next, voting on how much a person can play in game and banning people based on their popularity? That is really sad and would say a lot about the serve and nothing good. Okay I'm done NOOOO

-1

[mwan]

I'm another one of Dlgn's alt's

FTTY

[mwan]

It's not in chat, therefore their votes will be TAKEN seriously, regardless of intent.

Additionally, I am exceptionally weary of hearing people complain about "free speech". Firstly, the owner's Canadian, so American rights do not necessarily apply. Second, free speech doesn't apply on private property, which in this case would be the server that someone else is paying for so that you can use.

Also, this wouldn't take away dlgn's ability to say what he likes, it would limit how MUCH he can say.

Now, have a civil discussion about talking too much.

This classy cat brings up a legitimate point and i must agree. Non the less, I still find it fun to be on dlgn's post and doing this with him but, if measure's are taken, I will work with them.

[Seratias]

It's not in chat, therefore their votes will be TAKEN seriously, regardless of intent.

Additionally, I am exceptionally weary of hearing people complain about "free speech". Firstly, the owner's Canadian, so American rights do not necessarily apply. Second, free speech doesn't apply on private property, which in this case would be the server that someone else is paying for so that you can use.

Also, this wouldn't take away dlgn's ability to say what he likes, it would limit how MUCH he can say.

Now, have a civil discussion about talking too much.

Thank you, Ael, for speaking the minds of us non-Americans.
That aside, I will not be participating in the votes, but I encourage others with undecided minds to vote either yes or not to vote at all, seeing as I consider a certain level of Dlgn's silliness to be refreshing, but it's refreshingness negated by the amount of anti-community hate it spawns. Thanks for the compromise, Dlgn!

That's all I have to say.

[Rick]

Petty Internet drama amuses me. People who complain about a post count amuse me. People who complain at all amuse me.

-1 so it can continue.

-Rick

[jackavsfan]

I can't see it being okay to single out one player on the forums. If he's really causing problems, I suppose you could create a forum ban request. But I don't think he's THAT annoying.