[Seorsum]

Users are currently permitted to bump their ban appeal once per day. Bumping your appeal more than this will result in it being rejected.

Twiztidguy, why are you the one bumping this appeal? This appeal is for Sarahliz and in the post quoted it states that the person that is banned may bump once a day. Sarahliz hasn't bumped since April 1st, if she (assuming) wanted to bump, she should bump.

[Twiztidguy]

It didn't say I couldn't bump or show my support for a person. Sarah gave up after checking every day to see if her request was lifted or denied... well after MONTHS YOU KIND OF LOSE HOPE. So I'm picking her butt up and carrying her on my back to the finish line in a sense. Technically it doesn't even restrict me from bumping once an hour... but I'm trying to be respectful and not completely send us to page 18 before intelli makes his decision.

[jackavsfan]

Technically it doesn't even restrict me from bumping once an hour

Users are currently permitted to bump their ban appeal once per day. Bumping your appeal more than this will result in it being rejected.

[Twiztidguy]

Users are currently permitted to bump their ban appeal once per day. Bumping your appeal more than this will result in it being rejected.

Their Is possessive... Which means it only pertains and is restricted to that person who made the appeal.

I'm trying to be nice guys, please stop posting ignorant comments until you use your brain. You are getting this thread off frieken topic again over STUPID CRAP that you can figure out for yourselves if you use your head...

[OrigamiElephant]

Users are currently permitted to bump their ban appeal once per day. Bumping your appeal more than this will result in it being rejected.

Their Is possessive... Which means it only pertains and is restricted to that person who made the appeal.

I'm trying to be nice guys, please stop posting ignorant comments until you use your brain. You are getting this thread off frieken topic again over STUPID CRAP that you can figure out for yourselves if you use your head...

Why don't you go ahead and test your little grammatical technicality theory.

And you're not trying to be nice. Your post questioning the motivations of those that are in charge of Sarah's ban was the first instance of you being "less than cordial" and now this. Well, I suggest you use YOUR brain and readjust your internal perspective on what "nice" is.

And the only thing you said in your other post that really matters is this Twizted,

"Everyone should be judge by who they are, what they did, and any sign of remorse such as atleast one "I'm sorry" in the appeal"

Everyone IS being judged by who they are, what they did, and their signs of remorse. It's why the others are unbanned already and your friend is not. Sarah and her Xray is a special case, she doesn't get first Xray leniency, her punishment is being tailored to her specifically based on pertinent information and her character as a whole.

[jackavsfan]

I'm trying to be nice guys, please stop posting ignorant comments until you use your brain. You are getting this thread off frieken topic again over STUPID CRAP that you can figure out for yourselves if you use your head...

Actually you're the one who started the arguments by posting your rant about the lack of a decision for Sarah. Nobody was complaining when you were just bumping the thread.

[Twiztidguy]

No, there was no argument. It was people posting stupid responses to something that was intended for the staff. My comments towards these guys including you were not me arguing. It was me trying to educate because some of these people clearly don't understand the difference between a fork and a potato.

My first comment was intended for the staff, not people who are completely bored with their lives and trying to get a rise out of someone in the ban section. Please don't comment unless you have something intelligent to say that actually pertains to the ban. I'm sick of explaining stupid crap flooding the thread to to educate inferior players that have no impact on sarah's ban. Go do something positive with yourself instead of trying to tick me off which you are clearly doing...

[dlgn]

On an abandoned ban appeal, a user stands.

Twizkid.

Ready to face down any who might disparage it.

Flaming and arguing, day in, day out.

The original appealer is gone, yet he remains.

Tune in next time, when we see how long he gets forum-banned!

~dlgn

[MEMYYSELFANDME!!]

Sarahliz has lost confindence. We respect that you care, but it is her choice not yours to bump her thread. This is her appeal and her appeal only. You bumping it won't change a thing. If staff were gonna respond, do you think they would have by now after what like 4 months of waiting.

[monkeychunks]

He's allowed to bump once a day. More than that is not good for her appeal. She has been banned for a very, very long time for a ban...