[MEMYYSELFANDME!!]

This thread seems a little silly. You seem to mainly just be blaming things on frostybirth like a ban request. As for frosty's obsidian taking. Jack and kerovon are right that he is burning them because when they are fixed they are considered duped because they roll it back. Frosty was trying to do the right thing so he wouldn't own any duped items by burning them. The only question is why does frosty repeatedly remove it?
Correct me if i am wrong, because i may have misjudged things.

[cubeguy314]

Just out of curiosity, after the obsidian was looted a second time, why didn't you just use cobble or stone bricks? Both are ghast-blast resistance, they don't look ugly (well, the brick at least), and they are not allowed to be looted. Wouldn't that have simply solved the problem?

[jackavsfan]

Just out of curiosity, after the obsidian was looted a second time, why didn't you just use cobble or stone bricks? Both are ghast-blast resistance, they don't look ugly (well, the brick at least), and they are not allowed to be looted. Wouldn't that have simply solved the problem?

From what I gather, they didn't rebuild it at all. Here's the sequence of events as I understand it:
1. Frosty loots the obsidian.
2. Staff rolls back the damage.
3. Frosty sees that it has been rolled back, loots the obsidian again, and burns it.
And now here we are in this thread.

Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong because I don't know that I fully understand this.

[mr. roach]

Just out of curiosity, after the obsidian was looted a second time, why didn't you just use cobble or stone bricks? Both are ghast-blast resistance, they don't look ugly (well, the brick at least), and they are not allowed to be looted. Wouldn't that have simply solved the problem?

From what I gather, they didn't rebuild it at all. Here's the sequence of events as I understand it:
1. Frosty loots the obsidian.
2. Staff rolls back the damage.
3. Frosty sees that it has been rolled back, loots the obsidian again, and burns it.
And now here we are in this thread.

Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong because I don't know that I fully understand this.

I guess Cube's point would be valid right now considering stone brick isn't allowed to be looted.

[JonColmanator]

Here's my $.02.

By rolling back, Staff effectively 'duped' by Frosty still having the said obsidian and still being unbanned. Therefore Frosty has every right to see to it that the rules are being kept to, and he did so by removing the Obsidian a second time.

This is not harassment, this was in perfectly good intentions.

Repeated removal could be seen as harassment, though.

Thank you,

Colman.