[Intelli]

If we're deadlocked, I'm assuming that we lose our consensus and the matter once again goes back to the staff again?

He requires 51% of Yes's to be banned

So if it's 50%, then he will not be banned.

[jtcanon]

I would like you all to consider something. Maybe YOU are the reason Lightbulbs is "Harassing" you. If SOME people did not act rude back to him, they would have never been targeted. Lightbulbs is not a bad person, he is a human being, like all of us. I personally love him on our servers. He actually contributes.

So think about it, is it partially YOUR fault that this is happening? YOU were rude back, thus this rage being born.

[Keyhen]

I know this is pointless to fanatics about banning lightbulbs out there, but think of the other side of the coin as well:

Cons-
Harrasing others
Stealing
PVPing
Merciless(mild)

Pros-
Has stopped, and will continue stopping griefers
Has found exploits then told them to the mods, helps for 3.0
Has control of a large realm (con and pro)
Has given items to those he hurt (gonna get attacked for this)

Ill continue the list as it goes

[Lightbulbs]

Nobody is going to be convinced by any amount of arguments.
Voted to keep myself banned for lulz.

[Sharingan616]

Keywords: rude back.

He was rude to the players, and them being "human", they acted rudely towards him. Then he acts immaturely and harasses the players that think low of him.

Lightbulb's actions is not their fault what so ever. He chooses how to act. We don't choose or change for him.

[kerovon]

If you were not able to vote earlier, try again. It should be working.

[cerevox]

Lightbulbs should not be banned, but not for any silly reason like griefing or not griefing or being helpful or any of that non-sense, but because he is stylish enough to have a walfas sig. That alone should exempt him from bans.

[Lightbulbs]

Greifing is not aloud. I'm going to have to go with Yes. Sorry .
I don't like to say this but I am not going to play Minerealm with a known griefer on the server that a admin knows about not being banned permanently.

Zero activity until now. Clearly a sock puppet. Vote will and shall be discounted.

[Kress91]

Greifing is not aloud. I'm going to have to go with Yes. Sorry .
I don't like to say this but I am not going to play Minerealm with a known griefer on the server that a admin knows about not being banned permanently.

Zero activity until now. Clearly a sock puppet. Vote will and shall be discounted.

Possibly one of The Wolves' Den's members that are being forced to vote by Rokkr, but irrelevant, that vote should still be tossed out.

[Lightbulbs]

I see your vote
Try to be less conspicuous.