[Agospy]

[
1) You can mine first, build later.
2) A 50x50 realm at sea level has 160,000 blocks to place. If you filled up all 160 thousand blocks you are the saddest individual ever.
3) A mine doesn't effect the surface.
4) You know what? **** it. I'm done. I think your own idiocy speaks for itself.

1) You have a strange way of missing the entire point
2) Yah, lets screw aesthetics, and spacing and composition. Lets just cram everything into the 50x50 spot with reckless abandon.
3) Again, that's beside the point
4) No, no it does not. You have failed on every level to make an actual case as to why people should be charged to build a realm. You have yet to actual provide a reasoning behind your support for this decision. Instead, you've just made snide comment after snide comment. You contribute nothing to the discussion.

[Lightbulbs]

You have failed on every level to make an actual case as to why people should be charged to build a realm.

Except the two that you ignored for your own convenience.
Missing the point =/= Valid argument.

[JacobRules2011]

All I want is that you keep the /realm warp and NOT have a cost to make a realm!
Also I don't think anyone would ever have a realm if a rules is added that you need at least 6 members
to create a realm. :?

[Lightbulbs]

All I want is that you keep the /realm warp and NOT have a cost to make a realm!
Also I don't think anyone would ever have a realm if a rules is added that you need at least 6 members
to create a realm. :?

Casuals like you are the reason I tore down your realm.
Twice.

[Intelli]

Could have it that blocks placed before the realm was created get counted for the starting size.

[texas_hitman]

Could have it that blocks placed before the realm was created get counted for the starting size.

Kind of cheating. maybe a group of people that don't really care about realms are building a city and a team that collects 60 diamonds first decide to setup realm right on the other guys realm. but they would get screwed anyway.

[Intelli]

Could have it that blocks placed before the realm was created get counted for the starting size.

Kind of cheating. maybe a group of people that don't really care about realms are building a city and a team that collects 60 diamonds first decide to setup realm right on the other guys realm. but they would get screwed anyway.

Most likely using an automated system.
AKA, you don't pick the location. =]

[Lightbulbs]

Most likely using an automated system.
AKA, you don't pick the location. =]

Your last 3 proclamations fill me with so much happiness.

[Emerindyl]

How about, for starting a realm, we make it similar to a guild system in most games.

Ex: You need 6 players, and 10 diamonds, to start a realm.
This would encourage people to join up with other players, versus going solo.

I am pretty much solo even now and am ranked 22 out of 175 realms... I like building and I spend a lot of time doing it, I dont think it would be fair to only allow a realm to be established if you have heaps of players. I have been successful with building my realm, with next to no help.

[Emerindyl]

New changes:

1. Parties! /party create, /party join, /party invite, /party remove, /p <chat>
2. Party of 6 players (max party size) required to create a realm!
3. 60 diamonds required to create a realm. Oh yes. =]
4. New realms have a limit of 10 members. This can increase.

And more:

1. Default realm size will be increaed. (50x50?)
2. Possibly removing the 100x100 limits stated above.

Is this serious? Sorry, I dont mean to complain, but I dont like the part of six required to make a realm. Not at all. I dont think it is fair. Realms are why I chose this server, realms are why I donated.