[LordRamuthra]

I hate to go back on my word but I will post this anyway. This is a collection of my thoughts just written down. I have read all you have to say and you are all very persuasive in your reasoning. Your arguments are logical, they do make sense and I have embraced all the criticism you have given me. I want to make it very clear that I am writing this out of appreciation; I am not complaining about anything. Respectfully though, despite the blunt truth of your words combined between a shared view (lets be honest I have been arguing this case on my own pretty much) of all of you, it has been interesting. Your fondness for the server, system and Intelli are all quite moving in fact. You argue fiercly against me to defend the workings of this server, which has really led me to meet my match (if not forcing me to back down). It is plain that I cannot sway your views in favour of mine, for you think mine are niave, and that is fine. Past all the arguing I think you are all probably really nice people (should I add another 'really' for a flattery bonus?), and I in my last plea to whoever banned me from this server, would like to be allowed back on. I want to cut the crap too; it is obviously that spewing of bullshit in an attempt to gloss up arguments doesn't wash with you which I suppose is a good thing. I want to say thanks for taking the time to actually read my waffle (e.g. this post too), as I do have a knack of using many words to explain very little. I just hope that in all this you have at least seen (my original goal) the point that I was trying to make about evidence. I meant to say that in some cases I think more information can be extracted from things than at first glance. However your responses proved that you already know this, but I felt you could do with reminding. Well, thats my speech finished. Have fun ingame and have a good night. =)

[LordRamuthra]

Lol, I just thought of a couple more things I would like to say. I wrote all that stuff about 'bonejunky' and 'alienrobot' because I felt that the evidence was good enough, not because I was biased in any way and knew either of them, because I don't. After reading the original locked thread I thought that some points that cerevox made had not been argued back well by 'bonejunky' and I wanted to help him (I assume it's a him?). Also, I want to make a difference for the benefit of the server rather than trying to harm it, which is one of the aims of the arguments I posted. You all believe that my ideas would do more harm than good, and you have been playing longer, which tells me you are probably right. I will stop throwing my views at you (unless you like it ) and start listening. For the second time, goodnight everyone.

[panthers17nfl]

A very calm response :o. I'm surprised to see someone actually yield to an argument on the interwebs, even though we outnumbered your cause anyway. Good to see our tyrannical system will live to see another day I MEAN UM I will review your ban case once more to try to make a decision more desirable for you.

[Intelli]

I didn't even read any of the posts in this thread.

However, I agree that in general, topics shouldn't be locked.