[icarus1080]

Edited to include more detail?:

I think it would be awesome if the leaders of a realm could designate VIP's from other realms to have full realm permissions as if they were members. This would allow ... well it's freakin obvious what it would allow. People could go into each other's realms and help each other out without the risks associated with making a realm public, or the trouble of leaving and joining realms just to work on projects that members of separate realms might be interested in helping each other with.

I think it would be a good idea that a person might have to be a member of an existing realm before they can be designated as a VIP in any other realm, to prevent this from being too similar to the "membership in multiple realms" idea.

Commands might look something like:
/realm vip (name)
/realm notvip (name) to remove!

The difficulty of implementing this (or any other, mine or anyone else's) idea into Minerealm seems to be a popular topic of discussion. I care absolutely ZERO about anyone but Intelli's opinion on that. End of story.

[Pandagames]

I would like this for my next project a LOT. This could make the whole thing better for LBG, spleef arena and hiring workers!

[jtcanon]

I would like you all to look at some coding. This is not some "Simple" Thing to do. Before posting ideas, figure out what is required to make something like this happen. Intelli doesn't have all the time in the world. He IS the ONLY one who codes. At the moment, he is working on something awesome.

[snitalvixzon]

This is basically being in two realms, which if i'm not mistaken Intelli said will not happen. Icarus try to think things through next time. Maybe if specific people could come into your realm but not build or destroy blocks, I think that would be pretty cool, but i'm sure Intelli has far more important things to work on. I thought this post wasn't actually going to be a complete waste of my time when I saw the title but when I read it it was. This is also basically the same thing as your join multiple realms idea.

[panthers17nfl]

I shall now tap in to the rarely observed thread for posting ideas.

3. Understand that asking for Chat Commands and Warp Commands are not "quick and easy". Hopefully you've seen my post. There have been over 70 chat commands, 20 warp commands, and 30 Overhaul plugin requests since the server began. Less than 5 chat commands, no warps, and 1 Overhaul ever have been successful. Why? Because Intelli knows this statistic just as well as I do. If he listened to every single chat command request, no matter how "quick, easy, and important" you make it sound, it is very likely destined for failure.

I would like to analyze this just a bit further. This idea is just one of many chat commands. You also haven't made a very strong case for it, and so I don't see why anyone else would (aka: elaborate!).

This idea also poses the same problem as the one you posted earlier: we aren't very keen on wanting players to be in multiple realms. This is in fact the exact same idea as what you had earlier, except that now players are VIP's as opposed to members of multiple realms (which you yourself stated is the same thing :\).

[Lightbulbs]

I am amazed that Icarus is still requesting more inane plugins that have very limited uses.
Intelli is not here to please you. I'm amazed at how entitled and selfish you are to continue requesting, nay, demanding that Intelli spend hours, if not days, programming shit so you can use it for 1, maybe 2 things.
It seems you have another one of these pointless topics saying that you need people to work on plugins for you, yet you still haven't taken the lightbulbs challenge of attempting to write the code yourself. I sincerely hope forums bans start coming your way if you continue spamming the forums with new "Ideas' three times a week without ever having read the rules for posting in this subforum.

[cerevox]

Its like a deluge of crap. People, seriously, think before you post. This idea is nothing more than allowing people into multiple realms, which is already being discussed elsewhere. And i don't really care which idea was first. Both posters need to read those suggestions for suggestions that were already mentioned above.

[icarus1080]

To everyone who has posted (because you're all basicly coming from the same place, and you all have the same strange malfunction in common.):

No one should be reluctant to post an idea because of something as arbitrary as how difficult the idea might be to implement. I have no idea how to code Java. The dumbest reason ever not to like an idea has to be "well this is prolly hard to code." Who cares? Intelli? Ok, well lets see what he says about it then! lol I have no idea how difficult anyone's ideas would be to create. I'm not assuming that anything I suggest would be quick and easy, I'm merely making a suggestion and opening it up for discussion.

I think people need to learn to address the idea in question. Tell me what you think of the idea, not your massive foresight into the difficulty of the implementation, or your references to similar requests or any of that. Those things have nothing to do with the idea.

So, after the discussion of the IDEA is over, then you can go over to the "Difficulty to Code" part of the forums and talk about it there. :mrgreen:

[snitalvixzon]

To everyone who has posted (because you're all basicly coming from the same place, and you all have the same strange malfunction in common.):

No one should be reluctant to post an idea because of something as arbitrary as how difficult the idea might be to implement. I have no idea how to code Java. The dumbest reason ever not to like an idea has to be "well this is prolly hard to code." Who cares? Intelli? Ok, well lets see what he says about it then! lol I have no idea how difficult anyone's ideas would be to create. I'm not assuming that anything I suggest would be quick and easy, I'm merely making a suggestion and opening it up for discussion.

I think people need to learn to address the idea in question. Tell me what you think of the idea, not your massive foresight into the difficulty of the implementation, or your references to similar requests or any of that. Those things have nothing to do with the idea.

So, after the discussion of the IDEA is over, then you can go over to the "Difficulty to Code" part of the forums and talk about it there. :mrgreen:

You don't understand how hard it would be to do this. Hard work=little reward. Thats what your saying needs to be done. Icarus you are truly the stupidest person on these forums.

You don't post reasons why we need this, what would it do to help the server. You just post stupid things to try to make it a little bit easier for yourself. Theres no reason to add this so keep your mouth shut and come up with a reasonable way to put your ideas.

The difficulty of adding this is defiantly important in a idea post. You don't just say,"Well who cares if it takes Intelli days of slaving over his computer to get this added, I SAID I WANTED IT SO I WILL GET IT!"
Thats you right now icarus. It takes time and hard work to do stuff like this. Don't say you have no clue how to code java then command Intelli to do this for you.

When will icarus finally get a forum ban?

[cerevox]

No one should be reluctant to post an idea because of something as arbitrary as how difficult the idea might be to implement.

False. Arbitrary? Not at all. Perhaps you should look up what that word means. Apparently I am from a different school of thought though. I believe in a few things that I suspect you don't. That there ARE stupid questions. That not everyone is special. That not all ideas are created equal. Clearly, you wouldn't agree with those points. All of these though, add it up to the simple fact that someone should check their own idea before they spit it out for everyone else to deal with.

However, I honestly feel like having a wish list is okay. But when you request something, I get 'demand' vibes off it. That is what I am really objecting to. However, since I do feel that this has a 'demandy' air to it, i will go on to shred it.

I have no idea how to code Java. The dumbest reason ever not to like an idea has to be "well this is prolly hard to code."

Dumbest reason? Inability to complete an idea is the reason there are still wars, that cancer isn't cured, that the whole world isn't a utopia. Dumb or not, its the single biggest stumbling block to any idea possible.

lol I have no idea how difficult anyone's ideas would be to create.

Painfully obvious and the lol just makes you sound like you don't care.

I'm not assuming that anything I suggest would be quick and easy, I'm merely making a suggestion and opening it up for discussion.

As I said, my issue is that this is not the case. If this bit was true, I wouldn't mind nearly as much, but you have that demanding feel to your posts.

I think people need to learn to address the idea in question. Tell me what you think of the idea, not your massive foresight into the difficulty of the implementation, or your references to similar requests or any of that. Those things have nothing to do with the idea.

False. As I stated above, the difficulty associated with implementing an idea is one of the most critical factors in an idea's acceptance or denial. And we did address the idea assuming it could be instantly and effortlessly added, and found it lacking for reasons placed in other posts. And why should similar posts not matter, if they are relevant then they have standing and should impact the matter at hand. Those items all have a great deal to do with the idea. Simply discounting them because they impact your idea negatively is the height of disingenuous.

So, after the discussion of the IDEA is over, then you can go over to the "Difficulty to Code" part of the forums and talk about it there.

A repeat of the last bit, and an attempt to deflect negative commentary and flaws in the idea elsewhere by claiming they are not really about the idea but about the implementation of the idea, which is mere sophistry.

You must defend the whole of your idea, not merely the parts you feel are good while declaring that the poorly designed parts will be settled elsewhere or later.