[kongel nick]

the movie was bad because it did not tell most of the details about the book. Now, i know you can't fit 700 pages into a movie, but c'mon, that was lame. It did a bad job explaining a lot of stuff, too. It did not look as good as in the third movie, nor was it filmed as well at all. The acting was not good. Some things just did not seem like what the book meant them to look like. The fourth book was my second least favorite.

if it was your second least fav, of course the movie is going to be bad to you.

Granted, no story based on a book has all the detail. Most detail is narrated with descriptve insight on the main characters thought and concious feeling. there is NO way to do that in a movie.

i still really liked the fourth book, i just thought the movie was bad, and did a bad job of explaining everything, so some people who did not read the book were most likely confused afterwards.