Post any ban appeals or ban requests within this forum.
  • User avatar
  • User avatar
  • User avatar
By XsyntaXerrorX
#64695
xShockWavex wrote:This xsyntaxerrorx guy is not making friends very quickly with the borderline rude statements that he is defending himself and his band of cheaters with.
dude, read my appeal i havent defended myself even once!

...and no, cannabin0l will never be my friend.
By XsyntaXerrorX
#64702
xShockWavex wrote:That's how it came across to me. It's now how you view yourself in these cases, it's about them.
Everything i have written on this forum since my ban speaks for itself. I immediately admitted my wrongdoings and I, and eventually several others, sought thereafter to understand the Cheat rules properly when it comes to this so-called "auto-clicking while afk".

Before Spritzo and jdankk finally cleared it up Cannabin0l barked in with his arrogant holier-than-thou rhetoric. Why should I give him a pass on that? Oh and by the way, who else have i been "borderline rude" to? Or are u just making things up as you go along defending your master?
User avatar
By xShockWavex
#64705
This made me laugh. I was not defending Cannabin0l in any of my posts. I'm not here to argue with you, as this seems to be what you want. I'm done here, because you seem to be firing upon me for no reason. Your actions are not proper "Banned player" Etiquette and will not help your appeal.
User avatar
By Magerman
#64722
mitch1423 wrote:
Magerman wrote:2nd time lizzie has blatantly broken the rules lol
Please point me to the part of the rules that he has broken, thanks. Also I'm not sure why you post with the intent to harass.
I don't know maybe the rule of no hacking or exploits or anything that gives you an unfair advantage.

maybe that rule buddy good job thinking you know the rules though. the admins banned him because he broke a rule. So obviously a rule was broken
By _b3ast_
#64733
mitch1423 wrote:
_b3ast_ wrote:jdankk's point is more valid than anything here.
It isn't a mod. So his point is irrelevant.
modification to client, no. modification to gameplay, yes.
The game was changed in 1.8 (I think?) to disable constant punching with only 1 click. This proves the loop-hole being here.
By mitch1423
#64753
NTC has some vendetta against us, its the only reason they are posting.
By _b3ast_
#64758
Sir, no. I would post the exact same thing in Syntax's, yet I like the guy. It's not about "vendetta's" at all. And we know most about the situation as we are the ones to find out.
By mitch1423
#64765
Oh come on, you guys only care about us being banned.
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 11
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]