[chris-MHq9VME9JQ]

I am missing the option "None of those". While I like the idea of new features, I would not like if the features take away my security or make it harder for newbies or makes the game less balanced.

The country system described in http://minerealm.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1319 seems to take away my security. Other people can take over my realms if they have enough money. I dont want that.

The leveling system described in http://minerealm.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=0&t=4134 prevents newbies from entering the nether and gives ownership of all the glow stone to just a few, who then control the prices. unless... I heard rumors, that the nether is going to be bigger. If that is true, please advertise that and make us undersand better.

Based on the current info I have to say, country system and leveling system are pretty bad. The current system without any of those is a lot of fun though . I would rather keep the current system over these proposals. I am open to better changes though. Thx for hearing my opinion .

[aguy130]

I think kojai should get to have Britain.

[Kojaimea]

I think kojai should get to have Britain.

Challenge accepted, I will make England. All English people are welcome to help.

[atlarjy]

Interesting point.

I actually hadn't thought to ask if one of these would be done "in addition" to the existing realms or "in place of" the existing realms....it would make me kinda sad to lose the small realm I've been building out for the last few months, and suddenly lose the theft protection for the resources I've been storing up for after the wipe...

[aguy130]

I think kojai should get to have Britain.

Challenge accepted, I will make England. All English people are welcome to help.

What about silverknight? You two can do that project together as Crumpet Buddies!!

[cerevox]

Countries on the assumption that the plan to keep old realms is still going through. I like the idea of the massive groups of people being tied to their land and region rather than a free-floating guild.

[aguy130]

Countries on the assumption that the plan to keep old realms is still going through. I like the idea of the massive groups of people being tied to their land and region rather than a free-floating guild.

+50

[FaeynHeart]

I read through the 3.0 thread that deals with implementation of countries; however, I'm still slightly confused.

If the country system goes through, what exactly happens to players who have realms transferred after the wipe? Do we assume that they in themselves become a country (depending on the owner / realm name)? Do they become fortified with any amount of credits in the beginning? If a country conquers another plot, are we to assume that country then has the right to completely destroy everything contained in that plot? I'm not sure how the "no grieving" rule plays into this...

I apologize if these questions have been already answered. I did my best to search through the threads that I could find before asking.

[Kojaimea]

If a countries system is implemented there should be some sort of disadvantage for countries who have their realms split apart.

[mitchie151]

From what i've seen; id rather countries that cant be taken over, but are frequently merged. Kind of like the biggest realms in 3.0. They have huge amounts of land, but not every member is a part of every realm.