- Tue Aug 26, 2014 2:40 am
#191346
Considering I haven't been genuinely Minerealming for quite a while now, and sure this might sound a little biased from me, but at the same time perhaps an extraneous view might be tolerated? Gonna risk my neck anyway, for the sake of cutting the poop so to speak.
First of all, as Final correctly stated in my humble opinion, this appeal is pathetic/not an appeal. I think that he hit the nail on the head there.
Then, I refer to Falconis' image that he kindly posted for us, in conjunction with the whole 'you should've given him a warning' wah wah. Why am I referring to this, I hear you ask? That, in itself is a warning. Every time you see the signs in spawn, you are essentially being warned not to swear, keep respectful, etc. If anything, as a player who is approaching three years of experience, you're fairly lucky if staff choose to give you an additional warning on top of every single time you've seen the signs. The "you've read the signs" argument has been used in response to appeals before to good effect, yet for some strange reason, we seem to be singing a different tune here. Although, I appreciate that this could be a bit of a gray area, but at the same time, it should've been obvious from the start that VV was not one of River's close female friends.
Staff giving people warnings about their behaviour before banning is a leniency, not a requirement.
Also, if it was indeed true that VV was being rude about you behind your back (not saying that it is, by the way); this attack on her really isn't the best way to go about it, nor is any other form of disrespect for that matter. I believe trying to hit back was something Lioncats was also banned for? If VV was indeed dishing out the bs, the best thing you could've done is ignored her unless she stated something important.
I shall not go into the discussion of whether or not VV is appropriate for staff in this thread. If you genuinely want to hear my opinion, feel free to PM me about it.
First of all, as Final correctly stated in my humble opinion, this appeal is pathetic/not an appeal. I think that he hit the nail on the head there.
Then, I refer to Falconis' image that he kindly posted for us, in conjunction with the whole 'you should've given him a warning' wah wah. Why am I referring to this, I hear you ask? That, in itself is a warning. Every time you see the signs in spawn, you are essentially being warned not to swear, keep respectful, etc. If anything, as a player who is approaching three years of experience, you're fairly lucky if staff choose to give you an additional warning on top of every single time you've seen the signs. The "you've read the signs" argument has been used in response to appeals before to good effect, yet for some strange reason, we seem to be singing a different tune here. Although, I appreciate that this could be a bit of a gray area, but at the same time, it should've been obvious from the start that VV was not one of River's close female friends.
Staff giving people warnings about their behaviour before banning is a leniency, not a requirement.
Also, if it was indeed true that VV was being rude about you behind your back (not saying that it is, by the way); this attack on her really isn't the best way to go about it, nor is any other form of disrespect for that matter. I believe trying to hit back was something Lioncats was also banned for? If VV was indeed dishing out the bs, the best thing you could've done is ignored her unless she stated something important.
I shall not go into the discussion of whether or not VV is appropriate for staff in this thread. If you genuinely want to hear my opinion, feel free to PM me about it.
OrigamiElephant wrote:That's like saying you hate Microsoft, so you throw your Ipod in the dishwasher.