Talk about absolutely anything here!
  • User avatar
  • User avatar
  • User avatar
User avatar
By Lightbulbs
#15248
texas_hitman wrote:we get most of our oil from Canada.


watch this video and tell what yall think.

No, make your own topic.
This is a topic about people supplying donations to wounded soldiers. Make another topic for your anti-war bitching.
User avatar
By Lightbulbs
#15257
texas_hitman wrote:If people knew what was going on they wouldn't go to war. Making these types of donations useless.
So because war is bad wounded soldiers deserve no treatment.
You're retarded. Granted that was pretty much already known.
User avatar
By dragoncrystal24
#15260
What he means is that if nobody went to war, these donations would be useless because there would be no soldiers to wound, and thus, no soldiers to donate to.

Stop trying to twist other people's posts to try to troll.
User avatar
By Lightbulbs
#15262
dragoncrystal24 wrote:What he means is that if nobody went to war, these donations would be useless because there would be no soldiers to wound, and thus, no soldiers to donate to.
If the world was made of money, there's be no need for welfare because there'd be no poor people, thus no people to give welfare to.
Oh hey, I can make arguments based on impossibilities as well.
User avatar
By dragoncrystal24
#15264
Lightbulbs wrote:
dragoncrystal24 wrote:What he means is that if nobody went to war, these donations would be useless because there would be no soldiers to wound, and thus, no soldiers to donate to.
If the world was made of money, there's be no need for welfare because there'd be no poor people, thus no people to give welfare to.
Oh hey, I can make arguments based on impossibilities as well.
Yet, if the world was made of money, the value of money would rapidly decrease and soon a different substance would be used for economic purposes.

But yeah texas's post was an impossibility. Or rather, a highly unlikely event. I was merely translating his comment.
User avatar
By Lightbulbs
#15266
dragoncrystal24 wrote: But yeah texas's post was an impossibility. Or rather, a highly unlikely event. I was merely translating his comment.
You told me to stop trolling because I called his post out for being an impossibility, then when I restated what I said a second time using an analogy you agreed with me.
I think the problem is that you are too stupid to be in this discussion, and when you don't understand my argument you fall back on saying that I'm "trolling" to avoid the issue.
User avatar
By dragoncrystal24
#15269
Lightbulbs wrote:
dragoncrystal24 wrote: But yeah texas's post was an impossibility. Or rather, a highly unlikely event. I was merely translating his comment.
You told me to stop trolling because I called his post out for being an impossibility, then when I restated what I said a second time using an analogy you agreed with me.
Not necessarily. He was saying that if there was no war (no people to fight in it), these donations would be useless. You translated his post as saying that because war is bad, nobody should donate. He meant that if there was NO war, you shouldn't donate. YOU translated it as even if there is war, you still shouldn't donate. Obviously, I can't read his mind, so I may be wrong, but this is what I got from his post. You didn't call out his post as an impossibility, you just said that he didn't think people should donate. Compare them if you want.
Lightbulbs wrote:
texas_hitman wrote:If people knew what was going on they wouldn't go to war. Making these types of donations useless.
So because war is bad wounded soldiers deserve no treatment.
You're retarded. Granted that was pretty much already known.
User avatar
By Lightbulbs
#15272
dragoncrystal24 wrote:
Lightbulbs wrote:
dragoncrystal24 wrote: But yeah texas's post was an impossibility. Or rather, a highly unlikely event. I was merely translating his comment.
You told me to stop trolling because I called his post out for being an impossibility, then when I restated what I said a second time using an analogy you agreed with me.
You translated his post as saying that because war is bad, nobody should donate. He meant that if there was NO war, you shouldn't donate.
There is a war. Ergo your hypothesis is wrong. As there is only one given alternative, mine is right for the moment.
Thanks for proving that I'm correct.
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]