[Lightbulbs]

It's funny how he only apologizes after a mod tells him "If you would have apologized instead of shifting the blame you'd have been unbanned"

Face it. You aren't sorry you did anything, you're sorry you got caught. You are the most selfish pathological liar I'd ever seen. And least most people have the decency to give up here.

Who knows, maybe you can pull a Monkeytoad and grovel so long that the admins take pity on you entirely, but I wouldn't bet on it.

[wurstclam]

i could so easily take you down lightbulbs. ive seen how much of a PROBLEM you are, and i think that your criminal record is 50x worse than jaegerss. i think jaegerss is holding out the heat on you, because it won't help his ban appeal. i don't think anyone has time for you, and the BS you bring to the conversation. i talked to lm108, he says the no clip is FALSE and he said jaegerss was banned for griefing. ohmsen93 also said he was banned for griefing. he has apologized for all he has done, and that he will repay all the trouble he has done. you should look at some of the ways he will redeem himself, there very convincing.

p.s. lightbulbs ask yourself this: is this any of my (lightbulbs) business? shouldn't i (lightbulbs) not talk with such a big mouth because its just proving im a hipocrite becuase of my amazing criminal record? why would anyone care what i (lightbulbs) have to say?

just something to think about you post HOG.

[Rokkrwolf]

Actually he was suppose to be banned for noclipping from a admin but he spelt his name wrong so he bypassed till he was caught griefing. But ohmsen and lm might have missed that.

[wurstclam]

nope. sorry rokk but i talked to lm who was the one who banned him, and lm said that he was the one who said jaegerss used no clip. lm dropped the whole thing because there was NO evidence to support that he was modding. for pete sake jaegerss doesn't even know what no clip is. he thought no clip was inv edit.

tells me i used a noclip mod, i would tell him that i didn't because i only use my lol editor on singleplayer.
just to let you know loleditor only works by loading singleplayer maps

The guy thought inv edit was no clip^

research lol editor guys, and jaegerss, research no-clip, you should probably know what your being accused of.

[Lightbulbs]

It's funny how people think that because I have a long criminal record it means I don't know the difference between a good and bad appeal. Here's an amusing story.

I'm been banned 5 times and unbanned 4 times. That's an 80% success rate right there. Pretty sure that's more than anyone else has ever been unbanned.
I've also been responsible for getting 13 griefers banned. That's more than you'll ever do.
Of the 50+ appeals I've given my opinion on, only 2 of them were given a different ruling than the one I declared. That's a 96% success rate there.

Looks to me like I'm more than qualified to point out that the OP is a griefing liar. Hell I was even right about the No Clipping and the misspelling of his name which kept him unbanned, something which would have otherwise never been brought up. Seems to me that you're mad that I'm thorough.

EDIT: Oh, and Panthers was the one who banned him for No Clipping the first time around. Feel free to explain to me that the admin was wrong.

[Rokkrwolf]

I know lm108 banned him for griefing, lm had no clue about the previous ban, like I stated before panther17nfl (aka a admin) banned him for noclipping but spelt his name wrong so it never banned him. Of course lm108 had no evidence he's not the one who attempted to ban him the first time.

Not to mention this

2. Admins and Mods do not need to prove why they banned you. That's one of the things that put Admins and Mods at higher level of power. We don't even need proof in some cases. Our testimony is proof enough, and so don't complain that we don't have any argument prepared; our eyewitness testimony is our proof.

He can claim he has no idea what no clip all he wants doesn't negate the fact a admin saw him using it. Either way he can claim he does or doesn't know isn't gonna change the fact that was suppose to be why he was banned in the first place.

[jaegerss]

panthers, tell me where you live, i have never hacked on any game console, i can bring my laptop to you, and prove that it doesn't have no clip. please recheck the name on the player who did noclip, because i was with someone who was using it the other day when i was working on the path from the spawn. he told me he uses a mild fly hack so he doesn't get caught, his name is similar to mine, gagegar, and i think a busy admin who took a quick glance at the name got mine mixed up with his.
please recheck the names!

[Lightbulbs]

It's funny how he brings up that he knows a hacker now, instead of earlier like a model citizen that he claims to be would have done. He's totally believable.

In fact everything he says is quite funny. This has to be some of the most amusing groveling ever.

[wurstclam]

well bulbyboo, maybe jaegerss would have been able to tell us this information and all the facts sooner if he doesn't have to stop every other post to deal with your incesint interupting, arrogant opinions and stupid stories proving how old you are. im sure if you would stop sabotaging any chance he had of telling the community anything that might be important, he could get his thoughts straight and tell us all the important information he has left to tell. give the man some space.

[Lightbulbs]

give the man some space.

He had an entire initial post to give all the information he found important, and the information he found important was how great and awesome he is and how he didn nothing wrong and got banned for no reason.

Seems to me that's just a chronic liar trying to cover his own ass and when called out he has to place lies on top of the original lies, and now it's gotten to the point where it's just one huge train wreck.