stickgod91 wrote:cubeguy314 wrote:You're completely right Oneman. People sometimes vote about the player, not the appeal. If you look up top at the polls, it sas, "Should this appeal/request be accepted?" not "Should this player be accepted?"
Yes, that is correct but that is how many bans have played out. Lightbulbs, for instance, was banned by the community for bit having wrongs done but because the community all together did not like him. Now I am not saying no on likes sneakerhead because at times he can be like able but people vote no because of how they have been treated by this person and that can affect an appeal positively or negatively. If lightbulbs didn't lava people at spawn, kill them, loot them and grief them he might not have been banned.
Stick the thing is, most of those "people" I have done nothing to. Its tthe meer fact that there is already a dirty image when my name comes up, If I really treated everyone unfairly then I would have ban requests on me, just like lightbulbs. Do you see an entire page of ban reauests on me? If so please link me. But honestly unless your going to post why you disliem me, you are simply following what others think of me. If you talked to the people I talk to on skype they would tell you I am not a mean person, and infact some say they were scared to talk to me at first because of what everything people said about me. Honestly you have to get to know me, to say no to this appeal. The only person who has legit points behind a "no" is stickgod. I understand why he hates me. But the rest of you out there here is my message.
Unless you post why you dislike me, even a simple I dont like you will do; you really have no reason to click that "no" button as I have done nothing to you. If you explain though, then that changes.