[Awesomeness]

and also, why were u lavering them individually, why didnt you chuck the enitre stacks in from the inventory?

[xKatonx]

and also, why were u lavering them individually, why didnt you chuck the enitre stacks in from the inventory?

Because, I like throwing up items? Or, like watching tons of items fly from my mouth. :/ Idk, it's sort of preference when I want to throw away lots of items.

[jdankk]

ok its clear by that last post you dont know wat duping is, a duplicate is an exact copy of an item/stack, if they dupe a stack of 64, they will have 2 stacks of 64.

You can still dupe items even if the stacks aren't full.

[savesthedazed]

ok its clear by that last post you dont know wat duping is, a duplicate is an exact copy of an item/stack, if they dupe a stack of 64, they will have 2 stacks of 64.

You can still dupe items even if the stacks aren't full.

I think he was trying to say that whatever the original stack number was, that is the number your duped stack will be. You can dupe a stack of 20 just as easily as a stack of 64.

[xKatonx]

Yep..

[Awesomeness]

Why did you delete the images, you now have even less proof...

[OrionOne]

maybe katon realised jewiz is innocent and katon realised he had NO proof that jewiz dupes?

[terrancejones]

Yeah, this thread was supposed to be locked... basically, the two characters involved we were trying to save face... NOthing to see here, move along.