[connorartman97]

Today, Panda was bragging about how good his bank was and how no one could get into it, So i said i could, And he kept denying it finnaly he told me to prove it. So i went to there bank, and of course succesfully got in. And then was set on fire. Pictures coming in one second.

[connorartman97]

[DrCompanionCube]

I think we can sum that up.

I used exploits and got killed for it. Ban him.

But after trying to play MC and make a nice mine, the chat kept getting spammed by retarded messages on using this exploit and how no-one is safe. So I logged off, did alittle research on the topic and came back online to fix the problem. I then see Connor exploited into our store and was running around with panda yelling at him to leave. So I take out my lighter and burn him because he refused to leave.

And even if he bragged that you couldn't doesn't mean that you can break the rules and if you're retarded enough to break the rules then you'd should leave after proven.

[catsfuzz]

And even if he was there, that doesn't mean that I can break the rules and if I'm retarded enough to break the rules then I should leave after proven.

Dude, not trying to be mister mod or anything, but look, it is against the rules to light people on fire. It is considered indirect PVP, which is against the rules.

[Psychoshaman]

At first while lurking through this thread, I was for drcompanioncube. People that enter your realm and won't leave are indeed annoying, but after looking at what connor posted, I see now that you're abusing the leniency that is given to indirect PVP directed to unwelcome visitors to your realm.

You assumed that connor used an exploit, you then burned him which, exploit or not, inside your realm or not, is against the rules, is very annoying and understandable if used once, but not twice. If he doesn't leave, who cares? He can't get into your chests because they're protected inside your realm, he can't break blocks, and he can't PVP you if your PVP is turned off. So what's wrong with him being there?

[cerevox]

The indirect pvp rules are there for a reason. Deciding that someone else doing something you don't like is grounds to ignore a rule is just being a self-centered brat.

IIRC, trespassing is not against the rules. Setting people on fire while not pvping is against the rules.

It seems that Dr. believes himself above the rules if he decides he doesn't like the person. Pics of Dr. breaking the rules are provided, and he himself admitted to setting people on fire. It does not get more clear cut than that.

[Pandagames]

You assumed that connor used an exploit, you then burned him which, exploit or not, inside your realm or not, is against the rules, is very annoying and understandable if used once, but not twice. If he doesn't leave, who cares? He can't get into your chests because they're protected inside your realm, he can't break blocks, and he can't PVP you if your PVP is turned off. So what's wrong with him being there?

He was in fact using an exploit to get into the vault. I told him to leave and he did. Then he came RIGHT back with another exploit.

[connorartman97]

You assumed that connor used an exploit, you then burned him which, exploit or not, inside your realm or not, is against the rules, is very annoying and understandable if used once, but not twice. If he doesn't leave, who cares? He can't get into your chests because they're protected inside your realm, he can't break blocks, and he can't PVP you if your PVP is turned off. So what's wrong with him being there?

He was in fact using an exploit to get into the vault. I told him to leave and he did. Then he came RIGHT back with another exploit.

Everyone is fairly aware of the exploit. People use it all the time to get into my bank. Now i really actually don't want DrCompanionCube banned, he just kinda like... set me on fire.. So Yeah. I felt i was in need of contribution to this thread.

[terrancejones]

So basically, the accuser was taunting the accused to do something illegal against him, to which he did? That's pretty lame. Both parties, you should be ashamed of yourselves.

[cerevox]

On the indirect pvp rule, i am not seeing the part where it says "Ignore this rule if your target used an exploit". Does anyone else see that part? I sure don't. If he is using an exploit, report him. Don't start breaking rules on your own and make the whole thing even messier. That's the kind of action i expect from a grade schooler.