MrKeveCool wrote:Sorry torn but this isn't a good reason to ban people.
This can be used to ban people as warned by Intelli in the past if they fail to adhere to his requests.
TechnoProdigy wrote:It's Roobean's realm. Let Roobean do what Roobean wants to it. Last I checked there is not a written set of rules/regulations you have to conform to for you to keep your spawn realm.
There was an entire post by Intelli actually outlining the rules/regulations about how to maintain the spawn realms in the immediate area, but due to time that post would take hours to find.
fndfilms wrote:NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE has the right to tell you what to do with your realms. You payed for those realms and should not be challenged or told what to do.
If they are unappealing to the server and will give a bad impression, then Intelli has every right to tell you what to do with your realms. If you are willing to pay the high price for a spawn realm, then you have to be willing to uphold the responsibility bestowed on you to maintain impressive aesthetics to ensure you new players continue to stay.
And the quote below from another topic.
Intelli wrote:From the other thread:
Intelli wrote:Spawn policies only affect the realms directly around the spawn point (So the 4 realms directly touching the spawn building)
If you conisder that the "spawn building" is now infact the entire 4 realms of grass as they are untouchable of present. Then that would mean the first "Actual" tier of realms that users can buy and do what we want would be Roob's ring of realms. All the other realms around are visually pleasing, just simply not this one. Now I don't think she should be banned as she should have time to imrove it as has happened with all other cases similiar to this. But I do think that she does need to told to make it more visually appealing.