[dlgn]

Conspiracy theory generators are more fun. Check out http://www.verifiedfacts.org/ for news about what human rights were like before Oprah effectively ruled the world, how Osama bin Laden's descendants played key roles in the rise of Psy, and why Snooki invested in Halliburton's research projects that found that allergies are only caused by extraterrestrial microorganisms.

To respond to all of Verifiedfacts.org's utterances would take up too much room and time. I would like to address the most narrow-minded ones, though. Let me start by stressing that I am not attempting to suppress anyone's opinions, nor do I intend to demean Verifiedfacts.org personally for its beliefs or worldviews. But I do contend that I must appeal not to the contented and satisfied but embrace those tormented by suffering, those without peace, the unhappy and the discontented. I thought it couldn't be done, but, once again, Verifiedfacts.org's traducements have sunk to a new low. It should be stressed that we need to keep our eyes on Verifiedfacts.org. Otherwise, it'll convince iconoclastic Luddites that there is absolutely nothing they can do to better their lot in life besides joining it within a short period of time. If that thought doesn't send chills down your spine then you are dead to the love of freedom. The rest of us are concerned that Verifiedfacts.org says that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us. You know, I don't think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life.

I've already said this a thousand times and with a thousand different phrasings, but it wasn't so long ago that people like you and me were free to put an end to Verifiedfacts.org's evildoing. Recently, that's become a lot harder to do. What happened that changed things so much? To put it briefly, Verifiedfacts.org happened. By excoriating attempts to bring questions of recidivism into the (essentially apolitical) realm of pedagogy in language and writing, Verifiedfacts.org has managed to encourage childish bestial-types to see themselves as victims and, therefore, live by alibis rather than by honest effort. Why do Verifiedfacts.org's yeomen stick with it? I guess they must think, "Yes, it's a peevish fugitive. But at least it's our peevish fugitive."

Although the historical battle between good and evil is exemplified in the philosophical division between Platonic order and Aristotelian chaos, Verifiedfacts.org is the embodiment of everything petty in our lives. Every grievance, every envy, every bloodthirsty ideology finds expression in Verifiedfacts.org. Leaving aside the behavior of other puzzleheaded sad sacks, I once had a nightmare in which Verifiedfacts.org was free to egg on negative externalities in the form of evasion, collusion, and corruption. When I awoke, I realized that this nightmare was frighteningly close to reality. For instance, it is the case both in my nightmare and in reality that Verifiedfacts.org's hirelings mimic Verifiedfacts.org's behavior to the last jot and tittle. This just goes to show (to me, at least) that its monographs are based on hate. Hate, fetishism, and an intolerance of another viewpoint, another way of life.

If Verifiedfacts.org can't be reasoned out of its prejudices, it must be laughed out of them. If Verifiedfacts.org can't be argued out of its selfishness, it must be shamed out of it. If Verifiedfacts.org were allowed to shove angst-laden moral relativism down our collective throats, that could spell the wholesale destruction of countless lives. The only rational response to this looming threat is for all of us to search for solutions that are more creative and constructive than the typically raucous ones championed by vainglorious schizophrenics. To be more specific, the foundations of our free society are under wide-ranging and powerful attack by its quasi-wayward companions. No, scratch that. Let me instead make the much stronger claim that some flippant politicasters are actually considering helping Verifiedfacts.org formulate social policies and action programs based on the most silly classes of scapegoatism in existence. How quickly such people forget that they were lied to, made fun of, and ridiculed by Verifiedfacts.org on numerous occasions.

While Verifiedfacts.org manufactures crises over stoicism, its plunderbund has been destroying our moral fiber. There is only one way to stop Verifiedfacts.org from resolving a moral failure with an immoral solution. We must make out of fools, wise people; out of fanatics, men of sense; out of idlers, workers; out of demented, prolix stirrers, people who are willing to show Verifiedfacts.org how it is as wrong as wrong can be. Then together we can fight the good fight. Together we can show the world that I frequently wish to tell Verifiedfacts.org that it is guilty of a shocking display of dishonesty and sophistry. But being a generally genteel person, however, I always bite my tongue.

Everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that the simplicity and prejudice of Verifiedfacts.org's worldview, that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights, leads Verifiedfacts.org to give expression to that which is most destructive and most harmful to society. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche. After being called a self-centered proponent of hucksterism a hundred times or so by Verifiedfacts.org and its devotees, I have reached the conclusion that Verifiedfacts.org is terrified that there might be an absolute reality outside itself, a reality that is what it is, regardless of its wishes, theories, hopes, daydreams, or decrees. When we speak out against litigious mobocrats, we are not only threading our way through a maze of competing interests; we are weaving the very pattern of our social fabric.

Improvident utopians are somehow fascinated by Verifiedfacts.org's spleeny diablerie, just as a dove is sometimes charmed by a glittering serpent. Unfortunately for such people, Verifiedfacts.org seems to be involved in a number of illegal or borderline-illegal activities. For it and its serfs, who are legion, tax evasion and financial chicanery are scarcely outside the norm. Even financial fraud and thievery seem to be okay. What's next? Imposing a narrow theological agenda on secular society? I can say only that I admit that I'm not perfect. I admit that I may have been a bit intolerant when I stated that stolid pipsqueaks can't even agree among themselves as to how temperamental Verifiedfacts.org is. Still, that doesn't justify the name-calling, rudeness, and simple ugliness that Verifiedfacts.org invariably finds so necessary. Nor does it justify its fracturing family unity.

Given a choice of having Verifiedfacts.org disguise the complexity of color, the brutality of class, and the importance of religion and sexual identity in the construction and practice of Maoism or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day. I plan to seek liberty, equality, and fraternity. Are you with me—or against me? Whatever you decide, I have no set opinion as to whether or not Verifiedfacts.org has no qualms about using "enhanced interrogation techniques" to coerce its rivals into stating that its crimes are victimless. I do, however, honestly aver that I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with Verifiedfacts.org and its bootlickers, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that if we don't make some changes here right now, then Verifiedfacts.org's canards will soon start to metastasize until they add insult to injury.

If Verifiedfacts.org manages to corrupt our youth, our nation will not endure as a civilization, as a geopolitical entity, or even as a society. Rather, it will exist only as a prison, a prison in which brassbound trolls denigrate and discard all of Western culture. While Verifiedfacts.org might be able to convince the canaille that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming, I hope the readers of this letter can tell that if Verifiedfacts.org can't stand the heat, it should get out of the kitchen.

Verifiedfacts.org proclaims at every opportunity that it'd never pander to manipulative, negligent Verifiedfacts.org clones. The organization doth protest too much, methinks. That's not the most frightening thing about Verifiedfacts.org. Have you heard that it is an organization of questionable moral character? I find information like that disturbing on so many levels that I can't help but want to strike at the heart of Verifiedfacts.org's efforts to endorse a complete system of leadership by mobocracy. As this letter draws to a close, let us remind our castigators that we will resolve our disputes without violence. In this task we shall not flag or fail. Whatever the cost may be, we shall get people to stop believing lies that were forged in the fiery pits of hell. We shall go on to the end. We shall, with growing confidence and growing strength, embark on a new path towards change. We shall never surrender.



I kept my silence when Mr. Prodigy9 announced he wanted to create a Frankenstein's monster. I did nothing when he tried to give people a new and largely artificial basis for evaluating things and making decisions. But his latest hatchet jobs are the straw that breaks the camel's back. There are a number of reasons he isn't telling us as to why he wants to flout all of society's rules. In this letter, I will expose those reasons one-by-one, on the principle that he loves generating drama and conflict. That's why Prodigy9 repeatedly insists that granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. It's also why he believes in getting on my nerves.

Prodigy9's habitués have been staggering around like punch-drunk fighters hit too many times—stunned, confused, betrayed, and trying desperately to rationalize Prodigy9's narrow-minded, ribald ruderies. It is definitely not a pretty sight. If you think about it, we have a choice. Either we let ourselves be led like lambs to the slaughter by Prodigy9 and his brethren or we review the basic issues at the root of the debate. While I don't expect you to have much trouble making up your mind you should nevertheless consider that Prodigy9's views can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that if Prodigy9's thinking were cerebral rather than glandular, he wouldn't consider it such a good idea to smear and defame me.

I, speaking as someone who is not a stinking fabricator, support those who devote their life to education and activism. It is through their tireless efforts that people everywhere are learning that Prodigy9 says that he has been robbed of all he does not possess. As usual, he can be counted on to wrap every actual fact in six layers of embellishment. The truth is that there's a lot of daylight between Prodigy9's views and mine. He believes that he is forward-looking, open-minded, and creative while I assert that he maintains that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance. This is hardly the case. Rather, there is growing evidence that says, to the contrary, that he would have us believe that his prank phone calls are the carriers of civilization and that without them history is silent, literature is dumb, science is crippled, and thought and speculation are at a standstill. The reality, in contrast, is that Prodigy9 enjoys the sense of control that comes from forcing someone else to do things the way he wants them done. To cap that off, Prodigy9 must have recently made a huge withdrawal from the First National Bank of Lies. How else could he manage to tell us that children don't need as much psychological attentiveness, protection, and obedience training as the treasured household pet?

There is a problem here. A large, bookish, prolix problem. The key point here is that we must show Prodigy9 that we are not powerless pedestrians on the asphalt of life. We must show him that we can supply the missing ingredient that could stop the worldwide slide into philistinism. Maybe then Prodigy9 will realize that his scare tactics are becoming increasingly predaceous. They have already begun to practice human sacrifice on a grand scale in some sort of parviscient, hidebound death cult. Now fast-forward a few years to a time in which they have enabled Prodigy9 to engulf the world in a dense miasma of simplism. If you don't want such a time to come then help me test the assumptions that underlie Prodigy9's Ponzi schemes. Help me empower the oppressed to control their own lives.

I overheard one of Prodigy9's hangers-on say, "Mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues." This quotation demonstrates the power of language as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to disabuse Prodigy9 of the notion that his squibs are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos.

At the risk of shocking you further I shall point out that Prodigy9 is known for endowing obscurantism with a false legitimacy. This is not only a grotesque betrayal of the principles that Prodigy9 himself claims to uphold but a clear demonstration of how I wonder what would happen if Prodigy9 really did wipe out delicate ecosystems. There's a spooky thought. If you ever ask him to do something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored, and rebuffed. Although Prodigy9 revels in his gloomy campaign to strip people of their rights to free expression and individuality, it is also true that Prodigy9's partisans are an amalgamation of neo-nugatory thieves, salacious recidivists, and other lackadaisical simpletons. This is a perverse paradox, the implications of which are too loopy to dwell on short of saying that Prodigy9 is always prating about how his ideals epitomize wholesome family entertainment. (He used to say that the ideas of "freedom" and "irrationalism" are Siamese twins, but the evidence is too contrary so he's given up on that score.)

The fact is, I indubitably think that there are in fact many people who possess the intelligence, wisdom, talent, and ability to convert retreat into advance. My goal is to locate those people and encourage them to help me give Prodigy9 condign punishment. His shell games are evil. They're evil because they cause global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war. And, as if that weren't enough, I unequivocally hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before Prodigy9 does any real damage. Or is it already too late? Well, if I knew that, I'd be in Stockholm picking up my prize and a sizable check.

Prodigy9 insisted he'd never steal our birthrights. Unfortunately, it wasn't long before he did exactly that. He promised he'd never limit the terms of debate by declaring certain subjects beyond discussion, but then he did just that—and worse. At least Prodigy9 is consistent, but he wants nothing less than to pervert the course of justice, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his shabby, craven plaints. As our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the types of people Prodigy9 preys upon. I have no set opinion as to whether or not his continual falsifications of history neatly illustrate his adherence to opportunism. I do, however, decidedly feel that it is my opinion, as well as that of the courts, dozens of professional organizations, and numerous religious leaders, that Prodigy9 would love to see me serve as a human shield for his bombardments. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and in many cases it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it truly expresses how you should be able to live your life the way you want to live it. You shouldn't have to live in fear of Prodigy9 replacing our timeless traditions with his irrational, immoral ones.

Prodigy9 can get away with lies (e.g., that character development is not a matter of "strength through adversity" but rather, "entitlement through victimization") because the average person cannot imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will actually check out the facts for himself and discover that Prodigy9 is lying. By and large, what we're seeing is a domino effect of events that started with him stating that he has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring himself to help disseminate the True Faith of imperialism. That prevarication incited his serfs to cultivate the purest breed of irresponsibility. Inattentive, unpatriotic lamebrains reacted, in turn, by destroying that which is the envy of—and model for—the entire civilized world. The next domino to fall, not surprisingly, was a widespread increase in metagrobolism, and that's the event that galvanized me to tell everyone that Prodigy9 seizes every opportunity to condition the public—or, more precisely, brainwash the public—into believing that it's okay to place our children at imminent risk of serious harm. I cannot believe this colossal clownishness. Any sane person knows that Prodigy9 claims that he defends the real needs of the working class. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in his denunciations. Then again, Prodigy9's janissaries often reverse the normal process of interpretation. That is, they value the unsaid over the said, the obscure over the clear.

Prodigy9 shouldn't perpetuate harmful stereotypes. That's just common sense. Of course, the people who appreciate his undertakings are those who eagerly root up common sense, prominently hold it out, and decry it as poison with astonishing alacrity. Last but not least, the prevarications that Mr. Prodigy9's provocateurs are so proud of are woefully lawless.



~dlgn

[Prodigy9]

Help me give Prodigy9 condign punishment. His shell games are evil. They're evil because they cause global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war.

Sigged.

[dlgn]

Help me give Prodigy9 condign punishment. His shell games are evil. They're evil because they cause global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war.

Sigged.

That sounds even stranger out of context.

Bravo!

[faldette]

Prodigy9, both these appeared in the same "article" from that site:

The Chinese character for the war in Iraq looks a lot like the character for Angelina Jolie's name.

The Chinese character for the war in Iraq looks a lot like the character for Bill Clinton's name-- and it's not a coincidence.

Obvious conclusion from the above: Angelina Jolie == Bill Clinton. o.o

[Wormoxide]

This letter is not a memoir. Nor is it a policy memorandum issued by the government or by a local think tank. Rather, it is an assessment of how Mr. Intelli struts like a god on Mount Olympus, looking down on us mortals below. To get immediately to the point, Intelli's primary viewpoint, that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all totally justified, is directly related to the attitudes in our society that stifle dissent. Let's be sure that I've made myself absolutely clear: Intelli unquestionably wants me to wander around in a quagmire of self-pity and depression. If I did, I'm sure the chortles from Intelli and his army of diabolic bottom-feeders would be rich and prolonged, especially given how that's not the most frightening thing about Intelli. Have you heard that he never seems to listen to anyone else's positions and reasoning? I find information like that disturbing on so many levels that I can't help but want to deal with the relevant facts.

Intelli is stepping over the line when he attempts to place scurrilous bloodsuckers at the head of a nationwide kakistocracy—way over the line. He has been going around saying that granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. That's a bit of a furphy. The truth is that Intelli would have us sell us fibs and fear mixed with a generous dollop of boosterism. May God, in his restraining mercy, forbid that we should ever do this most reckless and scary thing!

The key point here is that I've known a number of honorable people who have laid down their lives to pronounce an enlightened and just judgment upon Intelli. Without exception, these people understood deeply that we must tear down Intelli's fortress of obstructionism. If we don't, future generations will not know freedom. Instead, they will know fear; they will know sadness; they will know injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. Most of all, they will realize, albeit far too late, that it's not the bogeyman that our children need to worry about. It's Intelli. Not only is Intelli more insensate and more avaricious than any envisaged bogeyman or bugbear, but he who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. Of course, people like Intelli who do in fact perpetrate evil draw young children into his quarrelsome way of life. Stand with me, be honest with me, and help me induce Mr. Intelli to perceive his errors of perception and judgment and make him realize that it is an actuarial certainty that he will let advanced weaponry fall into the hands of the worst kinds of pushy, improvident purveyors of malice and hatred I've ever seen sooner or later, and together we'll begin a course of careful, planned, and coordinated action. We'll tell him how wrong he is. I'm counting on you. Thanks for reading this.

[dlgn]

This letter is not a memoir. Nor is it a policy memorandum issued by the government or by a local think tank. Rather, it is an assessment of how Mr. Intelli struts like a god on Mount Olympus, looking down on us mortals below. To get immediately to the point, Intelli's primary viewpoint, that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all totally justified, is directly related to the attitudes in our society that stifle dissent. Let's be sure that I've made myself absolutely clear: Intelli unquestionably wants me to wander around in a quagmire of self-pity and depression. If I did, I'm sure the chortles from Intelli and his army of diabolic bottom-feeders would be rich and prolonged, especially given how that's not the most frightening thing about Intelli. Have you heard that he never seems to listen to anyone else's positions and reasoning? I find information like that disturbing on so many levels that I can't help but want to deal with the relevant facts.

Intelli is stepping over the line when he attempts to place scurrilous bloodsuckers at the head of a nationwide kakistocracy—way over the line. He has been going around saying that granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. That's a bit of a furphy. The truth is that Intelli would have us sell us fibs and fear mixed with a generous dollop of boosterism. May God, in his restraining mercy, forbid that we should ever do this most reckless and scary thing!

The key point here is that I've known a number of honorable people who have laid down their lives to pronounce an enlightened and just judgment upon Intelli. Without exception, these people understood deeply that we must tear down Intelli's fortress of obstructionism. If we don't, future generations will not know freedom. Instead, they will know fear; they will know sadness; they will know injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. Most of all, they will realize, albeit far too late, that it's not the bogeyman that our children need to worry about. It's Intelli. Not only is Intelli more insensate and more avaricious than any envisaged bogeyman or bugbear, but he who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. Of course, people like Intelli who do in fact perpetrate evil draw young children into his quarrelsome way of life. Stand with me, be honest with me, and help me induce Mr. Intelli to perceive his errors of perception and judgment and make him realize that it is an actuarial certainty that he will let advanced weaponry fall into the hands of the worst kinds of pushy, improvident purveyors of malice and hatred I've ever seen sooner or later, and together we'll begin a course of careful, planned, and coordinated action. We'll tell him how wrong he is. I'm counting on you. Thanks for reading this.

That's surprisingly accurate.

[Wormoxide]

This letter is not a memoir. Nor is it a policy memorandum issued by the government or by a local think tank. Rather, it is an assessment of how Mr. Intelli struts like a god on Mount Olympus, looking down on us mortals below. To get immediately to the point, Intelli's primary viewpoint, that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all totally justified, is directly related to the attitudes in our society that stifle dissent. Let's be sure that I've made myself absolutely clear: Intelli unquestionably wants me to wander around in a quagmire of self-pity and depression. If I did, I'm sure the chortles from Intelli and his army of diabolic bottom-feeders would be rich and prolonged, especially given how that's not the most frightening thing about Intelli. Have you heard that he never seems to listen to anyone else's positions and reasoning? I find information like that disturbing on so many levels that I can't help but want to deal with the relevant facts.

Intelli is stepping over the line when he attempts to place scurrilous bloodsuckers at the head of a nationwide kakistocracy—way over the line. He has been going around saying that granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. That's a bit of a furphy. The truth is that Intelli would have us sell us fibs and fear mixed with a generous dollop of boosterism. May God, in his restraining mercy, forbid that we should ever do this most reckless and scary thing!

The key point here is that I've known a number of honorable people who have laid down their lives to pronounce an enlightened and just judgment upon Intelli. Without exception, these people understood deeply that we must tear down Intelli's fortress of obstructionism. If we don't, future generations will not know freedom. Instead, they will know fear; they will know sadness; they will know injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. Most of all, they will realize, albeit far too late, that it's not the bogeyman that our children need to worry about. It's Intelli. Not only is Intelli more insensate and more avaricious than any envisaged bogeyman or bugbear, but he who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. Of course, people like Intelli who do in fact perpetrate evil draw young children into his quarrelsome way of life. Stand with me, be honest with me, and help me induce Mr. Intelli to perceive his errors of perception and judgment and make him realize that it is an actuarial certainty that he will let advanced weaponry fall into the hands of the worst kinds of pushy, improvident purveyors of malice and hatred I've ever seen sooner or later, and together we'll begin a course of careful, planned, and coordinated action. We'll tell him how wrong he is. I'm counting on you. Thanks for reading this.

That's surprisingly accurate.

Yup, when the generator spit that out with nothing but Intelli's name I was shocked. I am going to hide under my rock now before computers become even more sentient and kill us all. At least we know Intelli is on their priority hit list.

[faldette]

Mr. Intelli struts like a god on Mount Olympus, looking down on us mortals below.

o.o

[MEMYYSELFANDME!!]

I like rant generators better than just one person typing I want op in one giant blob. At least we have different sentences.

Here is what I think of when someone mentions ranting...

[dlgn]

Bendrake sent me an angry letter.

After hearing deelCorp say that it's inappropriate to teach children right from wrong, I felt that someone needed to write a dissenting opinion. To get immediately to the point, it makes a lot of exaggerated claims. All of these claims need to be scrutinized as carefully as a letter of recommendation from a job applicant's mother. Consider, for example, deelCorp's claim that cell-phone towers are in fact covert mind-control devices that use scalar waves to beam images into people's brains while they sleep. The fact of the matter is that some people have said that posterity will have little occasion to glorify its "heroic" existence in a new epic. Maybe. But I'm more inclined to believe that if my memory serves me correctly, neither deelCorp nor its minions have dealt squarely or clearly with the fact that deelCorp's stentorian, wily prevarications are to politics what the blitzkrieg was to international diplomacy. We can therefore extrapolate that in a tacit concession of defeat, deelCorp is now openly calling for the abridgment of various freedoms to accomplish coercively what its xenophobic metanarratives have failed at.

DeelCorp believes that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. Sorry, but I have to call foul on that one. DeelCorp wants to devastate vast acres of precious farmland. That's unequivocally a formula for repression and resentment and will lead to it using phallocentrism as a more destructive form of classism one of these days. While the question of who is right and who is wrong in this case is an interesting one, it is also something that I cannot and will not comment on, and not just because quisquilious stumblebums would be far more bearable if they didn't subvert our country's legal system. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further.

DeelCorp's long-term goal is to concoct a version of reality that fully contradicts real life. I hate to break it to it, but down that path lies only heartache and tears. That's why I insist on mentioning that deelCorp is capable of going berserk without notice. There's no need here to present any evidence of that; examples can be found all over the World Wide Web. In fact, a simple search will quickly reveal that deelCorp's intent is to prevent us from asking questions. It doesn't want the details checked. It doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts it presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of its "facts" are false.

In deelCorp's quest to endorse a complete system of leadership by mobocracy it has left no destructive scheme unutilized. Get this: DeelCorp insists that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the obstreperous hands of treacherous propagandists. [One minute break for laughter.] Whew! That's the funniest thing I've heard in weeks. Seriously, though, deelCorp keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that it is God's representative on Earth. The purpose of this deception may be to promote the total destruction of individuality in favor of an all-powerful group. Or maybe the purpose is to grant a free ride to the undeserving. Oh what a tangled web deelCorp weaves when first it practices to deceive.

Doesn't deelCorp realize that it and several groups of antisocial pissants are in cahoots to add insult to injury? If your answer is unthinking and automatic, you may be in trouble. You may be parroting back some of the concepts that deelCorp has injected into your head instead of giving serious thought to the notion that deelCorp generally tries to keep its distance from the disgraceful, laughable good-for-nothings who shift our society from a culture of conscience to a culture of consensus. However, it sees nothing wrong with imposing cranky new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of avaricious drive for power. Ah the sweet, sweet smell of hypocrisy. DeelCorp wants to prevent us from exemplifying the principles of honor, duty, loyalty, and courage. If it manages to do that, it'll have plenty of time to focus on its core mission: instilling a general ennui.

At this point in the letter, I'd like to categorize for you some of deelCorp's ruses. Unfortunately, they're far too impetuous and snippy to fit neatly into any single, overarching framework, so the best I can do is to convey the message that deelCorp is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in its own biases, gets into all sorts of hubristic speculation, and then makes no effort to test out its speculations—and that's just the short list! DeelCorp attracts socially inept psychics to its brownshirt brigade by telling them that everything will be hunky-dory if we let it carry our once-proud nation deeper into savagery and depravity. I suppose the people to whom it tells such things just want to believe lies that make them feel intellectually and spiritually superior to others. Whether or not that's the case, deelCorp finds it convenient to blame all of society's woes on choleric, Pecksniffian balloon heads. Doing so fits with the rest of its populist sloganeering and takes less intellectual effort than investigating the structural factors and material practices that may in fact be the true reason that deelCorp's success at making today's oppressiveness look like grade-school work compared to what it has planned for the future has so far formed an insuperable obstacle to my ability to present a noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. There are important lessons in that, even apart from another reminder that I'm not writing this letter for your entertainment. I'm not even writing it for your education. I'm writing it for our very survival.

I don't mean to condemn anyone's beliefs, but my fantasy is to immerse myself in the grandeur and greatness of the pre-deelCorp world, a world in which it was unfathomable that anyone could desire to encourage the most immature stuffed shirts I've ever seen to see themselves as victims and, therefore, live by alibis rather than by honest effort. As you've no doubt gathered, realizing such a fantasy requires presenting a clear picture of what is happening, what has happened, and what is likely to happen in the future. DeelCorp keeps stating over and over again that laws are meant to be broken. This drumbeat refrain is clearly not consistent with the facts on the ground—facts such as that I have a problem with deelCorp's use of the phrase, "We all know that…". With this phrase, it doesn't need to prove its claim that diseases can be defeated not through standard medical research but through the creation of a new language, one that does not stigmatize certain groups and behaviors; it merely accepts it as fact. To put it another way, uncouth deconstructionism is its quiddity. And I can say that with a clear conscience because there is still hope for our society, real hope—not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of bestial lugs but the hope that makes you eager to bring important information about its heartless views into the limelight.

Ruffianism-prone caitiffs speak in order to conceal—or at least to veil—their thoughts. Let me explain. I want to thank deelCorp for its lamentations. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how diabolic deelCorp can be. All I'm trying to do here is indicate in a rough and approximate way the froward tendencies that make deelCorp want to ignore compromise and focus solely on its personal agenda.

DeelCorp is a financial predator who preys on the elderly, the gullible, and the vulnerable. It seeks their assets to support its own lavish existence. Keep that in mind while I state the following: There's a famous mathematical proof that pertains to deelCorp. Essentially, this proof asserts that given that the core ethic of deelCorp's lynch mob has been its brash, unyielding nature, its unquestioning loyalty to deelCorp, and its eternal war footing constantly spoiling for a fight, then, loosely speaking, it must be the case that it wants you to believe that its mistakes are always someone else's fault. You should be wary of such claims. Be aware! Be skeptical! Think! Do not be diverted, deceived, or mesmerized by deelCorp's shameless positions.

Even deelCorp's functionaries don't care much for its political objectives; they simply wish to associate with other conniving fast-buck artists and muddy the word "anarchoindividualist". I fully intend to create greater public understanding of the damage caused by deelCorp's stances. That's the path that I have chosen. It's indisputably not an easy path, but then again, deelCorp justifies its sick-minded remonstrations with fallacious logical arguments based on argumentum ad baculum. In case you're unfamiliar with the term, it means that if we don't accept deelCorp's claim that two wrongs make a right then it will herald the death of intelligent discourse on college campuses. Thus, in summing up, we can establish the following: 1) DeelCorp's loquacity and volubility of tongue serve only to demand special treatment that, in many cases, borders on the ridiculous, and 2) it would love to see college campuses morph into small, ivy-covered North Koreas in which the student or faculty member who dares to establish clear, justifiable definitions of radicalism and Stalinism so that one can defend a decision to take action when its underlings force us to bow down low before ill-tempered beggars quickly finds himself in a heap of legal trouble.