- Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:41 pm
#85650
To re-rail this:
The final major nail in the coffin of stupidity like this (at least for games) is going to be the general recognition of video games as a legitimate art form. We're making pretty good strides in that area: Ebert got utterly shut down after his rejection of games as art, there have been major releases of artistic merit recently which garnered public attention (Skyrim, Mass Effect 3, etc.), Indie games, which are generally more artistically experimental, are on the rise, actually finding commercial success (Minecraft, anyone?), and there's recently been significant outcry over dissatisfaction with a game's STORY. Oh, and the Smithsonian has a video games as art exhibit. Just sayin'.
On top of all that, there are also any number of games that stand out for being amazing experiences, which, last I checked, is part of what art is supposed to DO. Ico and Shadow of the Colossus, Okami, Legend of Zelda, Bastion, the list goes on.
As to the actual bill, what they're trying to do is stupid, wrong, and FACTUALLY INCORRECT. It's also redundant, if parents are even attempting to do their job raising their children. The ESRB provides descriptors on every game, which give a pretty good idea of what sort of objectionable content it contains. Not that they're perfect, or even necessarily GOOD (I'm convinced mild suggestive themes = a boy and a girl talk to each other). Additionally, most retailers already refuse to carry games rated Adults Only, Basically, a parent already has the tools to do their job, and there's no need for the government to step in.
Don't beg for things! Do it yourself, or it isn't worth anything!
When in doubt, lurk moar.
For the love of everything, CHECK THE DATE ON THAT LAST POST!
STEP 0: CALM DOWN! Being angry won't help you.