[MrKeveCool]

http://minerealm.com/community/viewtopi ... 12&t=13816

its not the same eah ive built mine in a much diffrent way and my version can have several diffrent ID cards at once plus it has a fail trap. which means if someone gives the wrong ID card or wrong ID Number they will fall.

[Bu1ld0g]

http://minerealm.com/community/viewtopi ... 12&t=13816

its not the same eah ive built mine in a much diffrent way and my version can have several diffrent ID cards at once plus it has a fail trap. which means if someone gives the wrong ID card or wrong ID Number they will fall.

Make sure it's signed as such, traps require a warning mate

[MrKeveCool]

http://minerealm.com/community/viewtopi ... 12&t=13816

its not the same eah ive built mine in a much diffrent way and my version can have several diffrent ID cards at once plus it has a fail trap. which means if someone gives the wrong ID card or wrong ID Number they will fall.

Make sure it's signed as such, traps require a warning mate

this machine will not violate any rules on MR. every detail will be legit. and you can quote me on that

[Tyranitar140]

It seems like a good idea, but there are a few issues.

1. What if you loose your ID (assuming its an item)

2. How would this be vanilla?

3. This might just hurt people's feelings when their ID is rejected Etc.

[r292S]

Even though I wasn't going to initially post outside my appeal, I guess this could be cleared up/answered.

1. What if you loose your ID (assuming its an item)

As far as I know the system that this uses you can make a new ID just by naming a new item to what it was called.

2. How would this be vanilla?

It's just a redstone system, not exactly a 'suggestion' in the other manners of this board, but completely vanilla. E.g. You could make it in vanilla single player at the moment.

3. This might just hurt people's feelings when their ID is rejected Etc.

It would be similar to not being able to open a door on a private realm, so not exactly soul shattering.

[Tyranitar140]

Even though I wasn't going to initially post outside my appeal, I guess this could be cleared up/answered.

2. How would this be vanilla?

It's just a redstone system, not exactly a 'suggestion' in the other manners of this board, but completely vanilla. E.g. You could make it in vanilla single player at the moment.

So it would require absolutely no changes? Well, it seems like it would take a TON of work but it sounds amazing.

[MrKeveCool]

Even though I wasn't going to initially post outside my appeal, I guess this could be cleared up/answered.

2. How would this be vanilla?

It's just a redstone system, not exactly a 'suggestion' in the other manners of this board, but completely vanilla. E.g. You could make it in vanilla single player at the moment.

So it would require absolutely no changes? Well, it seems like it would take a TON of work but it sounds amazing.

its actually very simple :3

[r292S]

Even though I wasn't going to initially post outside my appeal, I guess this could be cleared up/answered.

2. How would this be vanilla?
It's just a redstone system, not exactly a 'suggestion' in the other manners of this board, but completely vanilla. E.g. You could make it in vanilla single player at the moment.

So it would require absolutely no changes? Well, it seems like it would take a TON of work but it sounds amazing.

You sort of messed up the quote in your post, fixed that for you in this one.
However, yes, no changes are required, it doesn't involve that much work it's basically just using the way named objects stack to give out a redstone pulse.

[Slathalin]