[INVALID] Redstone placement in wilderness.

[INVALID] Redstone placement in wilderness.#116038

By SneakerHead - Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:55 am

- Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:55 am #116038

I know that right now you have to own a realm to place redstone. but because you cannot buy realms in wilderness, I was thinking why not let us place it? Post comments and such. Please stay on topic.

Re: Redstone placement in wilderness.#116045

By dlgn - Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:59 am

- Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:59 am #116045

I voted no. Why, you ask? Because the reason you can't place redstone in public realms is to stop people from creating giant lag machines. I'm sure that this is what Intelli will say if you ask him.

~dlgn

I am the whirring thing past the corner. I am the darker patch under the bed. I am the tapping on your window; the extra steps on the sidewalk; the voice whispering your name. I am Stalkerbot, and I am watching you.

Re: Redstone placement in wilderness.#116067

By BSGSamuel - Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:55 am

- Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:55 am #116067

It would allow people to make more elaborate traps which would make the wilderness more fun in my opinion. This is one of the things I had forgotten and was dissapointed about when I tried to place redstone in the wilderness.

However, lag machines are indeed a problem.

EpicBros wrote:Bash your head on your keyboard and call it "pvp".

Re: Redstone placement in wilderness.#116068

By shaddowdemon - Thu Aug 16, 2012 12:08 pm

- Thu Aug 16, 2012 12:08 pm #116068

I make elaborate redstone traps without redstone dust.

Take a look at my client mod? http://minerealm.com/c/7/9867

Re: Redstone placement in wilderness.#116069

By BSGSamuel - Thu Aug 16, 2012 12:10 pm

- Thu Aug 16, 2012 12:10 pm #116069

If you really want to kill the server you can ofcourse just use repeaters instead of redstone dust. Not sure if Intelli will appreciate it though.

EpicBros wrote:Bash your head on your keyboard and call it "pvp".

Re: Redstone placement in wilderness.#116071

By eah - Thu Aug 16, 2012 12:15 pm

- Thu Aug 16, 2012 12:15 pm #116071

The wilderness is much harder to find than public land and the nether. So, it's much less likely that lag machines would be created in the wilderness than public land or the nether.

Voted yes.

Re: Redstone placement in wilderness.#116190

By SneakerHead - Fri Aug 17, 2012 10:24 am

- Fri Aug 17, 2012 10:24 am #116190

Bump, as I and many other people want this implemented

. Thanks! And keep them comment coming.

Re: Redstone placement in wilderness.#116210

By Eetrab - Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:01 pm

- Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:01 pm #116210

I voted yes. There is the problem with people creating lag machines, but the advantages outweigh this. Suppose there is a faction war. If you make many elaborate redstone traps, it can potentially be very dangerous (oh, and very fun).

Edit: corrected spelling

Always right.

Expanded FAQ

Rokkrwolf312 wrote:You people can't seem to grasp the fact griefing is griefing. There's no "Oh well it was only a few blocks," you break the rules you get banned plain and simple.

Re: Redstone placement in wilderness.#116228

By mitchie151 - Fri Aug 17, 2012 5:15 pm

- Fri Aug 17, 2012 5:15 pm #116228

No griefing noob will travel for over an hour, then work their ass off for reds tone only to make a lag machine.

Redefine would make the wilderness a far more interesting place.

Made it myself!

Re: Redstone placement in wilderness.#116232

By The-Jack-DeCk - Fri Aug 17, 2012 5:27 pm

- Fri Aug 17, 2012 5:27 pm #116232

mitchie151 wrote:griefing noob

Not all griefers are noobs. Some griefers are incredibly smart,and know how to leave more of a mark on a server than "haha I broke som stuff".

However, I'm going to go ahead and 'like' your post even after pointing that out. That's because you provided the most valid reason for having redstone be allowed.

Redstone dust to be placed on ground in wilderness