[DragonSlayer155]

This would be like having a second inventory, so no.

Last suggestion of this was rejected because an enderchest at trade is basically like a having a second inventory anywhere in the overworld.

It would essentially add a second inventory, which, as Intelli has stated in the past, is non-legit.

Guys. Read posts before saying the same thing over and over ._.

[Ste25]

It would be like having a second inventory, so I vote no.

[Grelman]

I think its unfair because it would be like having a second inventory from anywhere in the overworld, but hey thats just me.