[Ninjalo]

We would have to SPAWN IN the dragon. Making it 100% non-vanilla.

Intelli, while you're at it, why not give me 100k. Oh, and some diamond too. Along with a couple stacks of chiseled stone brick.

or just an unban lol

that too. :p

[dlgn]

What basically happened with the End (I think) is that Intelli made a way out of the end, despawned the dragon, then removed the exit portal. Or possibly he killed the dragon, got rid of the dragon egg, then decided after some End stone had been taken to remove the exit portal. One if those two. In any case, it's all legit. As for respawning the dragon, it wouldn't be vanilla, but I believe it would be legit, given that the reason for respawning it would be to make a way out of the End, which is vanilla. I'm against it though, not because of End stone--Glowstone crashed, and the economy isn't dead--but because of enchanting, which is its own subsection of the economy that I, personally, have invested a lot in. Others have, too.

~dlgn

[FDX]

What basically happened with the End (I think) is that Intelli made a way out of the end, despawned the dragon, then removed the exit portal. Or possibly he killed the dragon, got rid of the dragon egg, then decided after some End stone had been taken to remove the exit portal. One if those two. In any case, it's all legit. As for respawning the dragon, it wouldn't be vanilla, but I believe it would be legit, given that the reason for respawning it would be to make a way out of the End, which is vanilla. I'm against it though, not because of End stone--Glowstone crashed, and the economy isn't dead--but because of enchanting, which is its own subsection of the economy that I, personally, have invested a lot in. Others have, too.

~dlgn

You make a valid point.

But still, removing bedrock and the portal is not vanilla, so if this is the case, there should be a rollback and the portal back or something that Ninjalo will call 100% not vanilla when infact, it will be after its complete.

[dlgn]

Sometimes, non-vanilla things are necessary for the economy.

*cough*/trade*cough*

I don't want my doublechest of level 30s to go from 40,000 or whatever down to 5000. Plus, End stone investors would get really mad, although I don't have a problem with just one block going down in value.

~dlgn

[FDX]

Sometimes, non-vanilla things are necessary for the economy.

*cough*/trade*cough*

I don't want my doublechest of level 30s to go from 40,000 or whatever down to 5000. Plus, End stone investors would get really mad, although I don't have a problem with just one block going down in value.

~dlgn

WELL HURRY UP AND SELL UR STUFF

XD

[eah]

I see absolutely nothing wrong with respawning the dragon or wiping the end, seeing as how Intelli despawned the dragon with his god powers or despawned the portal that came after. Respawning the dragon is more vanilla than having no exit.

I don't care about the enchanting market, I don't care about the endstone everyone bought. Because, believe me, I know. I own some endstone, I've invested time and effort in the enchanting market that would go to waste. But I frankly don't care. I might not even care about no having access to the end, just as long as the enchants and endstone that come out of it are priced fairly.

Btw, I think the only thing Intelli has said about is "It's called the end for a reason." So, I don't think anyone can speculate about why he modified the end to how it is. He definitely doesn't care about suppliers of enchants. The markets should naturally change with minecraft updates.

[Miss.Pacman]

If the dragon WERE respawned, wouldn't the current owners of the portals have a potential monopoly?

[Soul K]

It should be respawning for those that want to kill it with their friends or even alone. Its fine if it was single player minecraft but MineRealm isnt about single player.

About the Portals, just move them or make them easily accessible or face a ban.

Lets face it cause if someone truely wanted "vanilla" gameplay they wouldnt be playing on a server that had protection/creeper explosion damage disabled/ etc...

Intelli can also make the end "private" and disable breaking blocks so players arent removing blocks and bringing them back too.

[FDX]

I see absolutely nothing wrong with respawning the dragon or wiping the end, seeing as how Intelli despawned the dragon with his god powers or despawned the portal that came after. Respawning the dragon is more vanilla than having no exit.

I don't care about the enchanting market, I don't care about the endstone everyone bought. Because, believe me, I know. I own some endstone, I've invested time and effort in the enchanting market that would go to waste. But I frankly don't care. I might not even care about no having access to the end, just as long as the enchants and endstone that come out of it are priced fairly.

Btw, I think the only thing Intelli has said about is "It's called the end for a reason." So, I don't think anyone can speculate about why he modified the end to how it is. He definitely doesn't care about suppliers of enchants. The markets should naturally change with minecraft updates.

What Eah says is troo.
-salute-

[fndfilms]

The point between "legit" and minecraft at some point needs to be changed, l do enjoyed going into the end when the person who had that realm let me go in a few times, but not being able to bring the blocks out to just annoying. Even with the ender dragon, that is also a minecraft thing. nothing to do with being "legit". In fact, the dragon is actually legit since it drops an egg to be respawned, which in real life, things that are in eggs hatch. The part of the end not having an exit, there was an entry and an exit build into the end for a reason, SO PEOPLE could get out. I'm with eah, I don't care about the enchant market, there are many other ways to make money and if people are worried about 3-5k in enchants, oh well. The idea was thought up legit of making an enderman grinder. If we shouldn't have an enderman grinder, why should we have normal grinders then?