Discuss anything regarding MineRealm Classic here.
  • User avatar
  • User avatar
  • User avatar
  • User avatar
  • User avatar

Do you support the wipe?

I prefer lag.
14
28%
I prefer the wipe.
36
72%
By CirJohn
#53683
Intelli seems to be under the delusion that removing all of these things will let him have a 150 player Minecraft server without lag.

Get a clue.

Unless jeb takes the time to finally multi-thread/processor minecraft, this is an impossible goal.

All this wipe will do is lessen lag for a day or two at most while destroying things that have taken people weeks or months to make.
By ramien123
#53685
Hey. It's my job to spot and call out bias.

This is biased. One option says "lets do this", and the other is "I like this bad thing".

That being said, "lets do this".
User avatar
By jeniansmom
#53687
Has anyone got any constructive solutions for the lag? I have seen a lot of people suggest lowering the player limit. I remember a lot of complaining (and whining on my part :) ) when the player limit was lowered b/c it was so hard to get on. The player limit was raised again.
Now the complaints are always about the lag. Which does get quite bad at times.
Intelli is trying to find ways to make the serve better, but his solutions aren't making everyone happy.
What are some alternative solutions that would make all/most people happy? Full wipe was outvoted. Is whitelisting an option that would make people happy, so that the player limit could be lower, but "regulars" could still get on? Is it possible to purchase more RAM for the server? Who would foot the bill for this? Would Intelli be expected to absorb the cost, or would donations become required? I don't personally know of a solution that would make everyone happy. I am grateful to Intelli for putting in so much effort. I am hopeful someone out there has a great solution, because it's ok to voice displeasure, but in the end that alone doesn't make things any better.
User avatar
By Cheez99
#53692
Voted no wipe. Don't like having to pay 50 rc for each redstone torch. I don't even use that much redstone, I just think it's a bad idea. If there's any wipe at all, it should be a full wipe, map and all.
By physaux
#53698
should be a third option for a full map wipe/ reset.

Without that, I can't say yes I can't say no. Do I want to further butcher the map, or keep it how it is? I'd rather have a full wipe/ reset, with these new restrictions into place from the beginning.
User avatar
By Intelli
#53703
physaux wrote:should be a third option for a full map wipe/ reset.

Without that, I can't say yes I can't say no. Do I want to further butcher the map, or keep it how it is? I'd rather have a full wipe/ reset, with these new restrictions into place from the beginning.
We had a poll for that, before 4.0 (which this is part of) - full map wipe was outvoted.
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]