Minerealm Community Forums

Ban request for harrassment, Le' screenshots for proof.

I asked him to stop, he continued his demands for free diamonds. Rather annoying, all things considered.

I would like to agree with this ban request, and note that in addition, he has been recently claiming that i was lightbulbs's alt, and complaining that i was typing "perverted chat". I have no screenshots, although it is in the chat records, of course, and those who were there at the time can confirm this (meepers20, flannyflan, roobean i believe, dr hetterscheidt, or whatever his name is).

dlgn wrote:I would like to agree with this ban request, and note that in addition, he has been recently claiming that i was lightbulbs's alt, and complaining that i was typing "perverted chat". I have no screenshots, although it is in the chat records, of course, and those who were there at the time can confirm this (meepers20, flannyflan, roobean i believe, dr hetterscheidt, or whatever his name is).

Confirmation From Meepers20.

Also, Blockman just trys to generally put down the community, he fails a bit too ,uch to keep going, but he still trys. He also start random arguments in chat with people, (mostly Me) and then threatens to ban request if he loses the argument, although, he comes back 3 minutes later saying: "I decided not to ban you, i'm too nice". So please, ban this Nuisance

meepers wrote:

dlgn wrote:I would like to agree with this ban request, and note that in addition, he has been recently claiming that i was lightbulbs's alt, and complaining that i was typing "perverted chat". I have no screenshots, although it is in the chat records, of course, and those who were there at the time can confirm this (meepers20, flannyflan, roobean i believe, dr hetterscheidt, or whatever his name is).

Confirmation From Meepers20.

Also, Blockman just trys to generally put down the community I support this server with everything I love Minerealm, he fails a bit too ,uch to keep going, but he still trys. He also TRIES TO IGNORE YOU - but keeps getting instigated about random arguments in chat with ME, (Only Me) and then threatens to ban request if he loses the argument, although, he comes back 3 minutes later saying: "I decided not to ban you, i'm too nice". So please, ban this Nuisance

Dlgn. I guess it wouldn't have sounded wrong if you didn't say anything correct?


YOU claiming (or randomly shouting for some reason out of the blue) about the ghost of lightbulbs. Then I asked if you are lightbulbs alt?


1) You told me once... behind a large wall of text that it "was annoying"
2) You never said you were going to ban request me during the incedent or afterwards- in fact, the picture shows you avoiding my questions

Block, despite your screens--which prove almost nothing, I might add--you have failed to explain why you were spamming messages at ryu. If this isn't harrasment, then I don't know what is.

CHAOSiron13 wrote:Block, despite your screens--which prove almost nothing, I might add--you have failed to explain why you were spamming messages at ryu. If this isn't harrasment, then I don't know what is.

I am sure this is not your position to be discussing whether or not they prove anything, re-read the quotes and the entire thread - maybe you missed some things. Anyways, you are not an administrator and I posted a screenshot of Minerealm's front page with the Twitter.

Can you please read to me the authors and vitals in these Twitter posts to the forums? Also, Ryu stated in-game that "other people have messaged me and recieved diamonds too." This isn't about the diamonds, but if you are going to put up 1,000 credits for people to SPAM your chat asking for diamonds, then try to remember that YOU were the one that wanted it done to you. The entire stream of my messages to Ryu were in quick succession, and honestly this lasted at the most 2 minutes after the /ad. (contrary to Ryu telling me it was over 5 minutes

In addition, I have a feeling that Agentred100 does not like me because of my public dislike of Arcane, and I believe Ryu was referring to him in the screenshot. If an admin with no bias can review this, that would be great. Furthermore, I can see self-portrayed--due to admin or well-known status--(and valuable to the people that wish me banned)"reasoning logic." against this post if an admin acts towards it with bias. The proof should be all in order, it's your call.

BlockMan wrote:

meepers wrote:

dlgn wrote:I would like to agree with this ban request, and note that in addition, he has been recently claiming that i was lightbulbs's alt, and complaining that i was typing "perverted chat". I have no screenshots, although it is in the chat records, of course, and those who were there at the time can confirm this (meepers20, flannyflan, roobean i believe, dr hetterscheidt, or whatever his name is).

Confirmation From Meepers20.

Also, Blockman just trys to generally put down the community I support this server with everything I love Minerealm, he fails a bit too ,uch to keep going, but he still trys. He also TRIES TO IGNORE YOU - but keeps getting instigated about random arguments in chat with ME, (Only Me) and then threatens to ban request if he loses the argument, although, he comes back 3 minutes later saying: "I decided not to ban you, i'm too nice". So please, ban this Nuisance

Dlgn. I guess it wouldn't have sounded wrong if you didn't say anything correct?


YOU claiming (or randomly shouting for some reason out of the blue) about the ghost of lightbulbs. Then I asked if you are lightbulbs alt?


1) You told me once... behind a large wall of text that it "was annoying"
2) You never said you were going to ban request me during the incedent or afterwards- in fact, the picture shows you avoiding my questions

So, what does this have to do with me?

meepers wrote: So, what does this have to do with me?

Please do not quote entire posts continuously (in fact I would consider erasing that), it makes reading the threads cluttered and confusing - Especially with regards to ban threads.

And Meepers20, *I hate to do this on forums for explaining* but you are a person to argue a matter as simple as this to the core of the earth (resulting in most of our arguments together), By the way, the only part of this post that deals with you is at the top - regarding a few sentences I considered mis-informed typos without supporting proof.

Blockman:

1. All I said was that something meepers had said was suggestive, which, though it could be considered immature, is something that isn't disallowed, as far as I know, as I've seen numerous regulars doing this again and again; and no one complained except you.

2. I did tell you that I was not lightbulbs's alt and mentioned that pds314 can confirm this. You just didn't screen me saying that, which I believe counts as answering your questions. You threatened to ban req me for making a joke. I had made a joke about lightbulbs's ghost mugging flanny (everyone was trying to guess why she wasn't moving after meepers joked that he had found her unconcious in a trashcan), and a joke the previous night about lightbulbs's ghost tying up rokkr, as rokkr was doing nothing at the time. Yes, I was shouting out of the blue about the ghost of lightbulbs. If you'd seen me enough, you would know that I often shout out of the blue about random things, as many can confirm.

3. I'm not sure what the third screen is supposed to be about, but I went afk to see the ban request that was started by Ryu_Aurora. I didn't ban request you myself--if I was going to, I would have told you. Dr. Hetterscheidt and some others did threaten to ban request you for harassing me about being lightbulbs (which i'm not). I don't recall saying you were annoying, but that isn't illegal.

EDIT: Block, the admins are impartial. What do you mean by "reasoning logic"? Also, Ryu said he might give you diamonds if you messaged him. He gave diamonds to those who were polite, and also messaged him only once. You publicly were rude to Ryu about wanting diamonds, even though he was out. That's why he didn't give you any. Even if Ryu was slightly unfair by not giving diamonds to everybody (which I don't think he was), that's allowed, and no excuse to spam him.