today i found out that i was banned. i think this is due to the person placing furaces at the spawn. i was just there and was not apart of it. i was wondering if this issue could be resulted asap.
Re: Theaceofspade's ban
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 5:54 am
by panthers17nfl
How are we supposed to know that you had nothing to do with it? Do you have proof saying that you weren't there?
I apologize, I'm not the person that banned you, so I cannot delve into detail as to the exact reasoning of why you were banned, but I trust it was because you were doing something you weren't supposed to. We don't just ban people who are walking around.
I would workshop your ban appeal :o
Re: Theaceofspade's ban
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 6:54 am
by Pandagames
panthers17nfl wrote:so I cannot delve into detail as to the exact reasoning of why you were banned
This is why I made my ban catalog.
Re: Theaceofspade's ban
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:30 am
by Lightbulbs
Pandagames wrote:
panthers17nfl wrote:so I cannot delve into detail as to the exact reasoning of why you were banned
This is why I made my ban catalog.
We've already explained why your thread s a waste of space, and some mods took pity on you and gave you minor amount of info because they felt bad for you, and like a stray cat after you've been fed once you keep coming back for more.
Don't spam other threads groveling for attention for a terrible concept, that's Icarus's job.
Re: Theaceofspade's ban
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:30 am
by panthers17nfl
*Pulls the thread back on topic. Gives an angry face to Panda and light.*
Re: Theaceofspade's ban
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 8:31 am
by s292r
You were banned for being in a greifing group with Darksideofoz (Furnace placer and modder) and gmaxonthe411 (Cameraman). You logged in a the exact same time as Darksideofoz, straight after gmax asked me if there were any mods online.
Re: Theaceofspade's ban
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 10:48 am
by cerevox
Circumstantial evidence, but very bad looking even then. And so we add the new bannable rule, 'guilt by association'. We seriously need to start posting all these new rules somewhere.
Re: Theaceofspade's ban
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 12:47 pm
by panthers17nfl
cerevox wrote:Circumstantial evidence, but very bad looking even then. And so we add the new bannable rule, 'guilt by association'. We seriously need to start posting all these new rules somewhere.
I'm on the job. But first, have to do something irl...
Re: Theaceofspade's ban
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:05 pm
by theeaceofspades
i was there but as seen is gmax's vid i was just watching.