Page 1 of 2

Issue: Schmappy

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:55 am
by Roobean
I don't know how to tell you this, but Schmappy's expostulations are so irascible as to beggar belief. To begin with, Schmappy's warnings are based on hate. Hate, vigilantism, and an intolerance of another viewpoint, another way of life. If narcissism were an Olympic sport, Schmappy would clinch the gold medal. He is more than merely maledicent. He's über-maledicent. In fact, Schmappy is so maledicent that he has found a way to avoid compliance with server regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and ruin my entire day—all by trumping up a phony emergency.

It is important to differentiate between callow, loud pettifoggers and blockish schmoes who, in a variety of ways, have been lured by Schmappy's self-righteous allocutions or who have ended up wittingly or unwittingly in coalitions with Schmappy's yeomen or who maintain contact with Schmappy as part of serious and legitimate research. Despite what he says, Schmappy wants to confuse the catastrophic power of state fascism with the repression of an authoritarian server in our minds. This desire is implanted in a part of his brain that's immune to reason or argument. Consequently, there's no chance that we can get him to see that he's more than disgraceful. Schmappy is mega-disgraceful. In fact, to understand just how disgraceful he is, you first need to realize that I myself am more than merely surprised by Schmappy's willingness to support hostile servers known for player-rights abuses, wrongful imprisonment, and slavery. I'm shocked, shocked. And, as if that weren't enough, trying to keep Schmappy from reducing players and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine is a sucker's game. No matter how hard we try to stop him, he'll always find some new way to degrade, divide, and destroy our server. Comments on the above are welcome, but please think them out first.

-[This is a happy trolling-ness from Roobean due to the amusement I found from Shampoo_Lord tping me to the /spawn when I least expected it a few times as a laf]

Re: Issue: Schmappy

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:54 am
by CHAOSiron13
Is this for real? Shamp's been very helpful to me whenever I talk to him.

Re: Issue: Schmappy

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:17 am
by bcbarton
That is the rantiest rant I've seen in a while and all without a single shred of evidence to back it up. I get the distinct impression that it is less than serious.

Re: Issue: Schmappy

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:21 am
by Sir_Dave88
that's some fancy use use of words there.
but when I read through it, It seems to be little more than some vague accusations.

So what was this ''phony emergency'' then?
How exactly does he circumvent server regulations?

the fancy use of words doesn't cover up the fact that you are viciously slandering Shamps name all over the place...
I'm not sure wether this is a real accusation or intended as a prank but I find it distastefull.

please explain.

Re: Issue: Schmappy

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:47 am
by _b3ast_
thesaurus.com

Re: Issue: Schmappy

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:09 am
by Wxclm
If this is real.... it is stupid.

If this is a joke....you are stupid.

P.S. Using big words from a thesaurus doesn't always make sense.

Re: Issue: Schmappy

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:35 am
by Prodigy9
Wxclm wrote:P.S. Using big words from a thesaurus doesn't always make sense.
No thesaurus involved. It's from an automatic "complaint generator."
http://www.pakin.org/complaint/

This sort of rubbish was spammed across the forums a while back, and I think the admins eventually started deleting them on sight. Not sure if temp forum bans were involved, but I hope they were.

Re: Issue: Schmappy

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 7:35 am
by TechnoProdigy
Yeah, the rant/complaint generators were heavily used a while back. I think they deserve a temp forum ban.

Re: Issue: Schmappy

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:16 am
by Rokkrwolf
Prodigy9 wrote: This sort of rubbish was spammed across the forums a while back, and I think the admins eventually started deleting them on sight. Not sure if temp forum bans were involved, but I hope they were.
They were deleted and the users were temp banned. Let this just be a warning if we see anymore it will happen.

Re: Issue: Schmappy

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:37 pm
by Shampoo_Lord
Oh yeah! Well you suck!