Kress
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 8:40 am
Well, I knew it was coming. In fact, I predicted it quite a long time ago when I said that Kress would exclude all people and proposals that oppose Kress' ignorant allegations. And now that he has, we must indubitably weed out people like Kress who have deceived, betrayed, and exploited us. In the first place, if anything, Kress has written more than his fair share of lengthy, over-worded, pseudo-intellectual tripe. In all such instances he conveniently overlooks the fact that if we don't do something soon, his sordid fairy tales will rise like a golem with a million hands on a million throats to choke the honor out of decent, hardworking people. Please remember that the first response to this from Kress' squadristi is perhaps that Kress should be a given a direct pipeline to the National Treasury. Wrong. Just glance at the facts: Kress is sincerely exasperated by the limitations that have thus far denied him the ability to mollycoddle anal-retentive spivs. That's the current situation, and if you have any doubt about the reality of it, then you haven't been paying close enough attention to what's been happening in the world.
Let's get reasonable; Kress claims that he's inflexibly honest, thoroughly patriotic, and eminently solicitous to promote, in all proper ways, the public good. I claim that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves although I should add that Kress' impetuous, conniving jackals like to shout, "Let's con us into believing that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. That'll be wonderful. Hooray, hooray!" But that won't be wonderful. Rather, it'll create an unwelcome climate for those of us who are striving to offer true constructive criticism—listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem.
Just as when something flies in the direction of your eyes, your eyelids close instantly and of their own accord, so too does Kress instinctively and automatically create an atmosphere that may temporarily energize or exhilarate but which, at the same time, will pose the gravest of human threats. One of the bilious remarks we often hear from him is that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that my bitterness at him is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish, then there is undeniably no hope for you. Mark my words: I would like to comment on his attempt to associate stoicism with exclusionism. There is no association. Lastly, absolutism can not and must not be tolerated.
(Troll Face)
Let's get reasonable; Kress claims that he's inflexibly honest, thoroughly patriotic, and eminently solicitous to promote, in all proper ways, the public good. I claim that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves although I should add that Kress' impetuous, conniving jackals like to shout, "Let's con us into believing that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. That'll be wonderful. Hooray, hooray!" But that won't be wonderful. Rather, it'll create an unwelcome climate for those of us who are striving to offer true constructive criticism—listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem.
Just as when something flies in the direction of your eyes, your eyelids close instantly and of their own accord, so too does Kress instinctively and automatically create an atmosphere that may temporarily energize or exhilarate but which, at the same time, will pose the gravest of human threats. One of the bilious remarks we often hear from him is that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that my bitterness at him is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish, then there is undeniably no hope for you. Mark my words: I would like to comment on his attempt to associate stoicism with exclusionism. There is no association. Lastly, absolutism can not and must not be tolerated.
(Troll Face)