Page 1 of 4

Lock/delete

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:26 am
by SilsuCrow
Final thread is up. Bit added on the first post to allow for people to check if the poll has been altered or not (if the first post has been edited or not).

Re: Protected Nether City - READ FIRST POST BEFORE VOTING

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:03 am
by Wxclm
You have put way too much time and effort into this haha. But all up, it looks like a good idea and I would be eager to see how the city goes in the future. Good luck, i know i'll be looking to get a place there.

Re: Protected Nether City - READ FIRST POST BEFORE VOTING

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:12 am
by SilsuCrow
Wxclm wrote:You have put way too much time and effort into this haha. But all up, it looks like a good idea and I would be eager to see how the city goes in the future. Good luck, i know i'll be looking to get a place there.
*Laughs* You'd be surprised how much of it was spontaneous "Hey, that seems like a good idea, let's run with it" =P

*Puts the finishing touches on signature* :D

Re: Protected Nether City - READ FIRST POST BEFORE VOTING

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:57 am
by BSGSamuel
We already have a protection system in the overworld. The nether is meant to be a dangerous and unprotected place, let's keep it that way. If you want to build an awesome city and don't want to be griefed you can do this in the overworld.

Then there is the issue of players who have private land in the nether city have an advantage over players who don't. I'm guessing you want chest protection too, considering you want people to have shops in the city. This means certain players will have protected chests in the nether while others don't and certain players can have protected buildings in the nether while others don't.

Re: Protected Nether City - READ FIRST POST BEFORE VOTING

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:59 am
by mitchie151
I like the plan, but if this gets protection, why can't MY nether city get protection.
This is why your argument doesn't work.
I voted no.

Re: Protected Nether City - READ FIRST POST BEFORE VOTING

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:04 am
by Cannabin0l
mitchie151 wrote:I like the plan, but if this gets protection, why can't MY nether city get protection.
This is why your argument doesn't work.
I voted no.
You should vote yes! :'( Not everyone is going to have there own city with protection.

It's not like Silsu will own it, mods/admins will. We'll all be lucky enough to be able to expand / purchase a realm for an extenuated cost most likely.

If anyone would like to, possibly it could expand upon faction creation of more then 8 people.

Re: Protected Nether City - READ FIRST POST BEFORE VOTING

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:54 am
by aguy130
Voted yes. Didn't read.

Re: Protected Nether City - READ FIRST POST BEFORE VOTING

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:20 am
by meepers
the nether is for fighting, factions. and people raging. :D But IF there was ma city it would need government and I think that some people if they were in the government they would abuse there powers and kill random civilians.

Re: Protected Nether City - READ FIRST POST BEFORE VOTING

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:25 am
by SilsuCrow
BSGSamuel wrote:We already have a protection system in the overworld. The nether is meant to be a dangerous and unprotected place, let's keep it that way. If you want to build an awesome city and don't want to be griefed you can do this in the overworld.

Then there is the issue of players who have private land in the nether city have an advantage over players who don't. I'm guessing you want chest protection too, considering you want people to have shops in the city. This means certain players will have protected chests in the nether while others don't and certain players can have protected buildings in the nether while others don't.
The city itself will be controlled by the mods/admins who will then determine who have building/chest access privileges. PvP WILL be allowed inside the city (Just discouraged in places like the market). Raids on other faction's realms will be ENCOURAGED. This will make the city only slightly less dangerous than the rest of the Nether because you won't have to worry about pits, random lava traps or TnT going off.

THE PROTECTION IS NOT TO GIVE ONE GROUP AN ADVANTAGE OVER ANOTHER, IT IS TO PREVENT GRIEFING.

God. Does NOBODY read the first post?
the nether is for fighting, factions. and people raging. But IF there was ma city it would need government and I think that some people if they were in the government they would abuse there powers and kill random civilians.
The owners, as I've said for the umpteenth time, WILL BE THE MODS AND ADMINS.

Re: Protected Nether City - READ FIRST POST BEFORE VOTING

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:15 pm
by SilsuCrow
mitchie151 wrote:I like the plan, but if this gets protection, why can't MY nether city get protection.
This is why your argument doesn't work.
I voted no.
Then I invite you to go through the same petition process that I'm trying to go through.

Also, apparently adding an option to the poll wipes the whole thing *annoyed*.