- Tue Jun 17, 2014 6:53 pm
#189381
I would like there to be a enforce on banning when it comes to book contract breaking. The reason for this is it would allow books to be able to be used as a contract that has the banning system to back it up. I think that this would be more of a "at the moment" type thing; example: if a person wants to rent a square of land in another players plot to use as a shop, instead of the player(who may think this is a good idea, or has this idea setup) would not have to go to the forum to setup the contract. I do not know if this will lower the amount of posts that go into the making of trade contracts on the forum, but it might be easier and more personal towards specific players. The staff can require whatever they want from a contract that is broken, I suggest that if contracts are made that there needs to be evidence on both parties: the person who has signed it needs atleast screenshot or video evidence about the completing of a contract and the contract's contents. The person who has made the contract will need evidence of his contract's contents and of the contract being broken. Since a book is signed it will show the name who signed it, namely the person who is signing the contract; this means that the staff must have the signed contract and not a copy(which can be forged) to be evaluated, along with the evidence, before they can make their decision. This is my suggestion about how it should be conducted if it is enforced; a problem I see from this is that it requires a physical presence of the staff to review the book. Some people do not use the forum, they should though, so this contract system can help with that towards new players or those who prefer not to use the forums.
I think this will require more indepth discussion, please respond why it is or is not an efficient and safe tool for trading/renting/other.
I think this will require more indepth discussion, please respond why it is or is not an efficient and safe tool for trading/renting/other.