Minerealm Community Forums

I think there should be an option to have multiple /homes.
Such as up to 5 /homes in different spots
You could name your /home a different name.
ex: /home 1 /home 2 /home 3... etc

Or have a /home between plots.
ex: /home plot 1 OR /tp plot 1

Just a suggestion.
Thank you,
Mia3268

Gosh I'd love this.

Unfortunatly, this has been suggested and rejected many many times before. It ruins lots of elements of play, so many people will vote no.
Sorry. -1

This has been suggested before and turned down before I think it will removes the vanilla part of minerealm and minerealm acts more like real survival when you have to walk to places

With the mist, this might not be a good idea.
Example 1:

Known public grinder spot. Mist happens, /home1, get gear, /home2, kill.

Example 2:

I know a person's /home. Mist happens, /home1, get gear, /home2, kill.

I say there should be 2 /homes

I agree with all of your replies.
This was just a suggestion and I disagree with it now too... lol
The whole Mist thing killed it.
Thanks for telling me your suggestions!
Thanks,
Mia3268

I would love this to get back and forth between my Mesa realm and my main realm. I mean what if you had to contact staff in game and they could give you an immovable /home2 or something, they would ask you why you are making a second, and check the position to see if it has any other advantages besides fast travel. It would also take a bit of trust, and could have certain requirements such as time on the server, and public Image. Idk, just my idea of how this /could/ work. but it would take a lot of work from staff, as they would possibly have to check up on them every once and a while to see if they have changed it for pvp advantage. but it would take away from MineRealms objective to be as vanilla as possible.

This has been suggested literally at least five times before (probably more like fifteen) and rejected each time. It's generally a good idea to search the before posting a suggestion to see if it's been suggested before.

Voting for reason already said in this topic