Page 1 of 1
[INVALID] Suggestion: Make wilderness rules more accessible
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:05 am
by brunk
As per title, make the specific rules relating to the wilderness easier to access, either by including those details in the current rules stickies, or by making this -
http://minerealm.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=9720 - a stickied thread.
cheers
Re: Suggestion: Make wilderness rules more accessible
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:15 pm
by TechnoProdigy
Man, I don't even know where the wilderness is, let alone the rules.
Re: [INVALID] Suggestion: Make wilderness rules more accessi
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:56 pm
by brunk
Why has this been marked invalid?
Re: [INVALID] Suggestion: Make wilderness rules more accessi
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:09 am
by brunk
bump for a reply / some feedback
Re: [INVALID] Suggestion: Make wilderness rules more accessi
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:38 pm
by MEMYYSELFANDME!!
The format for this was most likely poorly made. You didn't say what staff could do to make it easier to access. You simply said, "Easier access..." This doesn't really give staff any solid and well back-upped reason it should be accepted. When you say that they should include more detail in the current rules, you never give them one idea of what should happen. This is supposed to be a suggestion, but frankly staff are going to have to do all the idea plotting basically. Also the wilderness is easy to get to, just don't be lazy and walk a to it not that hard to do. I can see why this would be considered invalid. Don't continue bumping this thread, since bumping is for only ban appeals.
Re: [INVALID] Suggestion: Make wilderness rules more accessi
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 5:50 pm
by The-Jack-DeCk
I think ALL the rules need to be permanently up on page one. That's just my opinion, not sure if the staff have a reason to deny so or if they wish to deny so.
Re: [INVALID] Suggestion: Make wilderness rules more accessi
Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:40 am
by brunk
MEMYYSELFANDME!! wrote:The format for this was most likely poorly made. You didn't say what staff could do to make it easier to access. You simply said, "Easier access..." This doesn't really give staff any solid and well back-upped reason it should be accepted. When you say that they should include more detail in the current rules, you never give them one idea of what should happen. This is supposed to be a suggestion, but frankly staff are going to have to do all the idea plotting basically. Also the wilderness is easy to get to, just don't be lazy and walk a to it not that hard to do. I can see why this would be considered invalid. Don't continue bumping this thread, since bumping is for only ban appeals.
I'm not sure if you are being serious or trolling. If trolling, well played. My entire post is saying how they could make the rules more accessible. I could spell it out but that would be just re-posting what I've said. I don't know how to give a "TLDR" on something that was already pretty concise and to the point.
Re: "just walk to the wilderness". I wasn't asking how to get to the wilderness. I really have no idea what you are talking about. Please re-read my post and the rules page that i linked up.
EDIT: OK sorry i get it now. You think I asked for the wilderness to be easier to access. Actually i asked for the
rules about the wilderness - for example, the list of lootable blocks - to be easier to access.
Re: [INVALID] Suggestion: Make wilderness rules more accessi
Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:42 am
by brunk
The-Jack-DeCk wrote:I think ALL the rules need to be permanently up on page one. That's just my opinion, not sure if the staff have a reason to deny so or if they wish to deny so.
Jack thanks for reading and responding
Yes, all the rules up in the one post, in a spot where they can't be missed, would be awesome.
Re: [INVALID] Suggestion: Make wilderness rules more accessi
Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:04 am
by Rokkrwolf
I'm surprised anyone actually reads the rules. That's a first.
Re: [INVALID] Suggestion: Make wilderness rules more accessi
Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:05 pm
by monkeychunks
They are in the official rules
